2016
DOI: 10.1007/s12310-016-9180-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supporting Social and Emotional Skills After a Disaster: Findings from a Mixed Methods Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, when all students in a school experience a common trauma, the school may wish to take a universal approach to foster coping with that specific experience (Nastasi, Overstreet, & Summerville, 2011). In this issue, Powell and Bui (2016) report on the efficacy of Journey of Hope, an eight-session intervention designed for use at the universal level following exposure to a disaster. Their comparison of students who participated in a Journey of Hope group to students in a wait-list control group revealed significant increase in positive coping and prosocial behaviors among Journey of Hope students.…”
Section: Responding To Trauma and Resisting Retraumatizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, when all students in a school experience a common trauma, the school may wish to take a universal approach to foster coping with that specific experience (Nastasi, Overstreet, & Summerville, 2011). In this issue, Powell and Bui (2016) report on the efficacy of Journey of Hope, an eight-session intervention designed for use at the universal level following exposure to a disaster. Their comparison of students who participated in a Journey of Hope group to students in a wait-list control group revealed significant increase in positive coping and prosocial behaviors among Journey of Hope students.…”
Section: Responding To Trauma and Resisting Retraumatizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several interventions included a play component, but as this is not easy to classify into a single and exclusive category (Capurso & Ragni, 2016), it should be considered an integral part of the other components. Overall, 21 interventions were reported as manualized, of which 16 used ten previously-validated models for crisis intervention, namely the Critical Incident Stress Management Model (CISM; Morrison, 2007), the ERASE -Stress Program , the I-DEAL psychosocial support intervention (Griede & Speelman, 2007), the Mindfulness-Oriented Meditation training programme (MOM; Fabbro & Crescentini, 2016), The Journey of Hope (Powell & Bui, 2016), the Maytiv programme (Shoshani & Steinmetz, 2014), the Classroom-based School Reactivation Program (Wolmer et al, 2003), the Building Resilience Intervention (BRI; Baum et al, 2009), the Teaching Recovery Techniques (TRT; Smith et al, 2007), and the School Mediation Intervention (SMI; Humphries, 1999).…”
Section: The Intervention Componentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the accumulating evidence in these two areas, relatively little work has investigated effective policy interventions designed to limit or prevent exposure to crime and violence in community and neighborhood settings. Although there is growing use of and increasing research evidence on schoolbased practices that mitigate the negative impacts of exposure to violence after the fact (e.g., traumainformed teaching) (Overstreet and Chafouleas 2016;Powell and Bui 2016;Dorado et al 2016), less work has been devoted to understanding effective policies to limit or prevent exposure to crime and violence in the first place.…”
Section: <A>1 Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%