2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.07.275
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supporting pupils with cancer on their return to school: a case study report of a reintegration program

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Across nine publications, including two meta-analyses, [18,19] one systematic review, [1] two individual quantitative studies, [10,22] and four qualitative studies, [6,[23][24][25] findings consistently indicated that school reentry programs increased educators' knowledge about the medical and psychosocial aspects of cancer, led to more positive teacher attitudes toward the child with cancer, and increased teachers' confidence and comfort levels managing issues encountered by patients with cancer who are returning to school. Of note, one study [6] reported that increased knowledge about pediatric cancer might inadvertently increase worry and concern by teachers regarding side effects and academic achievement (although it should be noted that increased levels of worry, when appropriately directed, might result in more effective school support for the child with cancer).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Across nine publications, including two meta-analyses, [18,19] one systematic review, [1] two individual quantitative studies, [10,22] and four qualitative studies, [6,[23][24][25] findings consistently indicated that school reentry programs increased educators' knowledge about the medical and psychosocial aspects of cancer, led to more positive teacher attitudes toward the child with cancer, and increased teachers' confidence and comfort levels managing issues encountered by patients with cancer who are returning to school. Of note, one study [6] reported that increased knowledge about pediatric cancer might inadvertently increase worry and concern by teachers regarding side effects and academic achievement (although it should be noted that increased levels of worry, when appropriately directed, might result in more effective school support for the child with cancer).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, two studies found that educators' increased knowledge about diagnosis and treatment improved their ability to provide more comprehensive educational programming suited to students' specific needs. [23,25] Similarly, four studies, including two meta-analyses, [18,19] a systematic review, [1] and an individual qualitative study, [24] indicated that school reentry programs increased peers' knowledge concerning the medical and psychosocial aspects of cancer and improved peers' attitudes toward and increased interest in interacting with the student with cancer. In a meta-analysis of six intervention studies, increased knowledge among classmates was found to be associated with less fear of and a more positive attitude toward the child with cancer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lowest self-reported HRQoL scores were among children with chronic failure (48.91, SD = 18.17) and children with sbina bifida (23.04, SD = 10.02). Results from previous studies [13] suggest that child's returning to school after hospitalization may bring hope that the child could achieve a regular development again. Programmes for reintegration of chronically ill children into schools would likely provide opportunities for social, emotional and cognitive development [13,14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The literature shows that peers are one of the key determinants in successful school reintegration of children with cancer (Georgiadi & Kourkoutas 2010). The literature shows that peers are one of the key determinants in successful school reintegration of children with cancer (Georgiadi & Kourkoutas 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In summary, this shows a continued need to focus on the importance of school reintegration of children with cancer and maintaining contact with their peer groups throughout the treatment period. The literature shows that peers are one of the key determinants in successful school reintegration of children with cancer (Georgiadi & Kourkoutas 2010). Intervention studies should explore different ways of learning during intensive treatment in order to ensure that the children maintain their normal academic development.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%