2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-6144-8_12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supporting Mobile Instructional Design with CSAM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous research focusing on adopting mobile learning technologies and pedagogies indicated that educators are likelier to adopt innovative practices if they perceive a sense of self-efficacy with pedagogical approaches (Power, 2015(Power, , 2018aPower et al, 2016). Faculty need to feel comfortable with the content and pedagogical knowledge before developing the technological expertise necessary to become thoroughly competent (Cavanaugh et al, 2013;Finger et al, 2010;Koehler & Mishra, 2006, 2008Power, 2015Power, , 2018aPower, , 2018bPower et al, 2016;tpack.org, 2021). This research also tells us that faculty's willingness to innovate with new technologies and approaches can be enhanced if they have a strong support network that includes organizational leadership, technology-based support, and a collegial community of practice (Power, 2015(Power, , 2018aPower et al, 2016).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Previous research focusing on adopting mobile learning technologies and pedagogies indicated that educators are likelier to adopt innovative practices if they perceive a sense of self-efficacy with pedagogical approaches (Power, 2015(Power, , 2018aPower et al, 2016). Faculty need to feel comfortable with the content and pedagogical knowledge before developing the technological expertise necessary to become thoroughly competent (Cavanaugh et al, 2013;Finger et al, 2010;Koehler & Mishra, 2006, 2008Power, 2015Power, , 2018aPower, , 2018bPower et al, 2016;tpack.org, 2021). This research also tells us that faculty's willingness to innovate with new technologies and approaches can be enhanced if they have a strong support network that includes organizational leadership, technology-based support, and a collegial community of practice (Power, 2015(Power, , 2018aPower et al, 2016).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the novelty of the context, educators must overcome the "perceived ease of use" to successfully transition to online teaching. Power (2018b) discusses the impacts of targeted professional development and access to knowledgeable peers and communities of practice on educators' progression through TAM. These factors, explored through the lens of the Technological-Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK) model, are presented in Figure 3 (Cavanaugh et al, 2013;Finger et al, 2010;Koehler & Mishra, 2006, 2008Power, 2015Power, , 2018aPower, , 2018bPower et al, 2016;tpack.org, 2021).…”
Section: Supporting Faculty To Integrate Digital Tools and Pedagogiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Drawing upon the Technology Acceptance Model (Davis, 1989) and the Technology, Pedagogy, and Content Knowledge Model (Cavanaugh et al, 2013;Finger et al, 2010;Koehler & Mishra, 2006, 2008Power et al, 2016;tpack.org, 2021), Power (2015Power ( , 2018aPower ( , 2018b reported that educators increase their confidence with technology-specific skills through informal support networks, communities of practice, and curated just-in-time resources. Furthermore, participation in formal professional development focused on instructional approaches can increase the willingness of higher education faculty to innovate 12 with technology (Power, 2015(Power, , 2018a(Power, , 2018b. Finally, pedagogical innovations that reduce transactional distance (Moore, 1989(Moore, , 1991 promote the establishment of Communities of Inquiry and draw upon the principles of Universal Design for Learning (Power, 2015(Power, , 2018a(Power, , 2018b.…”
Section: Supporting Faculty Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, participation in formal professional development focused on instructional approaches can increase the willingness of higher education faculty to innovate 12 with technology (Power, 2015(Power, , 2018a(Power, , 2018b. Finally, pedagogical innovations that reduce transactional distance (Moore, 1989(Moore, , 1991 promote the establishment of Communities of Inquiry and draw upon the principles of Universal Design for Learning (Power, 2015(Power, , 2018a(Power, , 2018b.…”
Section: Supporting Faculty Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%