Supporting local planning and budgeting for maternal, neonatal and child health in the Philippines

Abstract

BackgroundResponsibility for planning and delivery of health services in the Philippines is devolved to the local government level. Given the recognised need to strengthen capacity for local planning and budgeting, we implemented Investment Cases (IC) for Maternal, Neonatal and Child Health (MNCH) in three selected sub-national units: two poor, rural provinces and one highly-urbanised city. The IC combines structured problem-solving by local policymakers and planners to identify key health system constraints and strategies to scale-up critical MNCH interventions with a decision-support model to estimate the cost and impact of different scaling-up scenarios.MethodsWe outline how the initiative was implemented, the aspects that worked well, and the key limitations identified in the sub-national application of this approach.ResultsLocal officials found the structured analysis of health system constraints helpful to identify problems and select locally appropriate strategies. In particular the process was an improvement on standard approaches that focused only on supply-side issues. However, the lack of data available at the local level is a major impediment to planning. While the majority of the strategies recommended by the IC were incorporated into the 2011 plans and budgets in the three study sites, one key strategy in the participating city was subsequently reversed in 2012. Higher level systemic issues are likely to have influenced use of evidence in plans and budgets and implementation of strategies.ConclusionsEfforts should be made to improve locally-representative data through routine information systems for planning and monitoring purposes. Even with sound plans and budgets, evidence is only one factor influencing investments in health. Political considerations at a local level and issues related to decentralisation, influence prioritisation and implementation of plans. In addition to the strengthening of capacity at local level, a parallel process at a higher level of government to relieve fund channelling and coordination issues is critical for any evidence-based planning approach to have a significant impact on health service delivery.

Evaluating health service coverage in Ghana’s Volta Region using a modified Tanahashi model

“…Despite policy integration to support free maternal and child health services to promote universal access to health care, the proportion of women who had verified valid insurance cards showing active membership in the NHIS was significantly lower than other reported studies [30]. Additional data from our study area show that 86% of women responded yes to having ever registered as a member of NHIS, and approximately 36% reported having valid cards that were not valid upon inspection.…”

Investment case for improving maternal and child health: results from four countries

“…It also relies on the follow through of governments on their plans. Despite the inclusion of public-private partnership initiatives to improve facility-based delivery in the 2011 plans for Pasay City in the Philippines, subsequent plans reverted to the building of new public facilities [22]. …”

Bottleneck analysis at district level to illustrate gaps within the district health system in Uganda

“…Furthermore, the modified Tanahashi model was used in Papua New Guinea, Nepal, India, Philippines, and Indonesia as part of the Investments Case Framework that supports planning and budgeting [20–22]. It was also used in a field trial in Bangladesh to establish policy opportunities for evidence-based planning for immunization and its limitations [23].…”