2012
DOI: 10.1177/016146811211400307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supporting Dialogically Organized Instruction in an English Teacher Preparation Program: A Video-Based, Web 2.0-Mediated Response and Revision Pedagogy

Abstract: Background/Context This paper theorizes and describes a program-wide pedagogical design for teacher preparation that addresses central problems related to supporting beginning teacher candidates in designing engaging classroom interactions in and across diverse contexts. Focus of Study In particular, we aimed to support the development of dialogically-organized classroom interactions over time through a pedagogy informed by Multiliteracies. Our pedagogy involved a Web 2.0-mediated process of Video-Based Respon… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(23 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, the most recent large-scale study of the US classrooms (Nystrand et al , 2003) found that about 90% of student–teacher interactions involved teachers’ known-answer questions. Related research on classroom literary discussion in China, England, Israel and Nigeria, among other countries, similarly indicates that without specific interventions, teachers continue to use known-answer questions to drive discussions about literature (Basmadjian, 2008; Hardman et al , 2008; Juzwik et al , 2013; Nystrand, 2006; Barak and Lefstein, 2021; Olson and Land, 2007; Reznitskaya and Glina, 2013; Wu et al , 1999). This practice is even more common in lower tracked classrooms (Oakes, 2005; Watanabe, 2008), which disproportionately serve Black, Brown and low-income students.…”
Section: Challenge Of Asking Authentic Questions In Classroom Literar...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, the most recent large-scale study of the US classrooms (Nystrand et al , 2003) found that about 90% of student–teacher interactions involved teachers’ known-answer questions. Related research on classroom literary discussion in China, England, Israel and Nigeria, among other countries, similarly indicates that without specific interventions, teachers continue to use known-answer questions to drive discussions about literature (Basmadjian, 2008; Hardman et al , 2008; Juzwik et al , 2013; Nystrand, 2006; Barak and Lefstein, 2021; Olson and Land, 2007; Reznitskaya and Glina, 2013; Wu et al , 1999). This practice is even more common in lower tracked classrooms (Oakes, 2005; Watanabe, 2008), which disproportionately serve Black, Brown and low-income students.…”
Section: Challenge Of Asking Authentic Questions In Classroom Literar...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over recent decades, studies of classroom discussions in language arts (LA) have shown that teachers’ open-ended or authentic questions – questions that invite multiple and sometimes conflicting responses – support rich, generative interpretive sensemaking about literary texts (Juzwik et al , 2013; McCann et al , 2006; Nystrand et al , 2003; Sosa et al , 2016). Currently, many teachers practice open-ended questioning in their teacher education programs and believe in the value of such questions.…”
Section: Challenge Of Asking Authentic Questions In Classroom Literar...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Teachers wishing to support dialogic talk also face the challenges of moving beyond scripted talk, managing a sense of loss of control of class (Adler, Rougle, Kaiser, & Caughlan, 2003Chinn, Anderson, & Waggoner, 2001), and needing to trust uncertainty and a kind of chaos of dialogism (Aukerman, Belfatti, & Santori, 2008). Some teachers fear that discussion reduces content coverage (Caughlan, Juzwik, Borsheim-Black, Kelly, & Fine, 2013) or exam preparation (Juzwik, Sherry, Caughlan, Heintz, & Borsheim, 2012). Given more space to interpret texts and topics, students may develop seemingly peculiar interpretations (Lee, 2001) or raise themes teachers are unprepared (or unwilling) to facilitate--for example, death in the family (Möller, 2004) or race-related issues (Rogers, Marshall, & Tyson, 2006).…”
Section: Challenges In Enacting Dialogic Instructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A focus on students and interactions is supported by noticing (Sherin, Jacobs, & Phillip, 2011), enabled by observing videos of one's own teaching (Heintz, Borsheim, Caughlan, Juzwik, & Sherry, 2010;Juzwik et al, 2012), writing reflections (Rogers et al, 2006), and transcribing interactions (Meneses et al, 2018). Rosaen, Lundberg, Cooper, Fritzen, and Terpstra (2008) found video-prompted reflection on discussion enabled teacher learning in ways memory-based reflections did not; video shifted PSTs' focus from management to instruction, aided noticing specific learner actions beyond general trends, and helped shift teacher focus to student focus.…”
Section: Teachers Learning Dialogic Instructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If video teaching is used for teaching, we can nd that there are many advantages in the form of video teaching: through video teaching, we can turn the originally boring teaching content into a video with pictures, text and sound, so as to attract students' interest and facilitate their understanding [6]. Compared with many other teaching methods, video teaching can save classroom time and increase classroom content, thus improving teaching e ciency and curriculum effectiveness, and saving time for teachers and students [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%