2008
DOI: 10.1002/sres.943
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supporting crime detection and operational planning with soft systems methodology and viable systems model

Abstract: In recent years the introduction and subsequent enhancements of information technology has seen the emergence of major opportunities for developing new approaches to improve information interchange. The provision of information provides opportunities to find resolutions to problem situations, and the power of providing relevant and accurate information through using information systems cannot be underestimated. However, the world of information systems thinking has, so far, experienced difficulty finding a met… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
14
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In that case, there are the following possibilities: firstly, employment of systems methodologies within the System of Systems Methodologies [18] that implies using one systems methodology as a dominant and another methodology as a supportive or within Total Systems Intervention in which different methodologies may be used within the same intervention to deal with different aspects of the problem situation (e.g., [19]). Then, one complete systems methodology can be combined with the parts of another methodology (for example, using the Viable System Model or System Dynamics' causal loop diagrams within Soft Systems Methodology) (e.g., [20]). Finally, the most complex situation is the one in which the parts of methodologies from different paradigms are used together within particular problem situations-for example, cognitive maps with System Dynamics' models (e.g., [21]) or rich pictures, root definitions and conceptual models as the key methodological tools of SSM with System Dynamics' causal loop diagrams and stock and flow diagrams (e.g., [22]).…”
Section: A Conceptual Framework For Combining the Systems Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In that case, there are the following possibilities: firstly, employment of systems methodologies within the System of Systems Methodologies [18] that implies using one systems methodology as a dominant and another methodology as a supportive or within Total Systems Intervention in which different methodologies may be used within the same intervention to deal with different aspects of the problem situation (e.g., [19]). Then, one complete systems methodology can be combined with the parts of another methodology (for example, using the Viable System Model or System Dynamics' causal loop diagrams within Soft Systems Methodology) (e.g., [20]). Finally, the most complex situation is the one in which the parts of methodologies from different paradigms are used together within particular problem situations-for example, cognitive maps with System Dynamics' models (e.g., [21]) or rich pictures, root definitions and conceptual models as the key methodological tools of SSM with System Dynamics' causal loop diagrams and stock and flow diagrams (e.g., [22]).…”
Section: A Conceptual Framework For Combining the Systems Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soft systems methodology is an approach composed of seven steps [41][42][43]. These steps rely on the human activity systems concept in order to define the challenge and propose changes or transformations ( Figure 9): Figure 9.…”
Section: From the Concept To The Field: Action Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Complementary methods/methodologies Schwaninger, 2000 Team syntegrity Schwaninger, 2004b System dynamics Ríos, 2006 System dynamics and team syntegrity Kinloch et al, 2009 Soft systems methodology Donaires et al, 2010 Team syntegrity Jones et al, 2007 Agent-based simulation Azadeh and Darivandi, 2010 Discreet-event simulation Darivandi Shoushtari et al, 2011/ Darivandi Shoushtari, 2013 SCOR model and democratic hierarchy Figure 3 shows the methodology and the output of each step.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%