2005
DOI: 10.1007/s10796-005-5337-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supporting Conceptual Awareness with Pedagogical Agents

Abstract: This paper describes a series of efforts in building and conceptualizing software agents for distributed collaborative learning. The agents are referred to as pedagogical agents. We have integrated pedagogical agents within two collaborative environments, TeamWave Workplace and Future Learning Environment. The role of agents in these environments differs from past work on software agents in their function as extended awareness mechanisms, focusing on task and concept awareness (conceptual awareness). Our appro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Another debate is to what extent automated feedback should be proactive, reactive or latent (Mørch et al, 2005). A system that provides sentence openers and step-by-step guidance is proactive.…”
Section: Technology Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another debate is to what extent automated feedback should be proactive, reactive or latent (Mørch et al, 2005). A system that provides sentence openers and step-by-step guidance is proactive.…”
Section: Technology Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If it allows "wrong" actions to be taken before it gives hints and critique, it is reactive. If the system does not take any suggestive action on its own at all, but allows the learner to request guidance upon demand, it is latent (Mørch et al, 2005). All three intervention strategies are important in CSCL environments, but not at the same time.…”
Section: Technology Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Groups which were supported with feedback were also more proactive in the planning of their group process. Morch et al (2005) focused on how groups of dispersed people are enabled to work and learn together through enriched web-based environments which are capable of capturing important information from group interaction, but so far they fail to provide a useful and easily handled representation of this information, which may have a complex structure.…”
Section: Review Of Existing Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, Paolucci et al [8] focus interventions in guiding students to solve academic problems. According to the criteria used by [9], it is possible to intervene in the work of students not only to optimize solutions but also to ensure optimal collaboration between classmates. Some alternatives have already been explored to include artificial intelligence (in some of its variants) to the field of teaching, such as incorporating virtual assistants adapted to specific classes and different levels of students [10] or in online courses to mitigate the impact of the volume of students [11].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%