2014
DOI: 10.1080/17517575.2014.928950
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supporting capacity sharing in the cloud manufacturing environment based on game theory and fuzzy logic

Abstract: This paper proposes a Framework for Capacity Sharing in Cloud Manufacturing (FCSCM) able to support the capacity sharing issue among independent firms. The success of geographical distributed plants depends strongly on the use of opportune tools to integrate their resources and demand forecast in order to gather a specific production objective. The framework proposed is based on two different tools: a cooperative game algorithm, based on the Gale–Shapley model, and a fuzzy engine. The capacity allocation polic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At present, scholars have built various characteristic models for CMfg service selection and scheduling (SSS) problems [7] (or service composition [8], task scheduling [9,10] and service sharing [11,12]). Tao et.al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At present, scholars have built various characteristic models for CMfg service selection and scheduling (SSS) problems [7] (or service composition [8], task scheduling [9,10] and service sharing [11,12]). Tao et.al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some scholars integrate these factors into a single objective through weight values and design effective algorithms, such as the: parallel method [8], workload-based method [9], two-level method [10], cooperative method [26], chaos control optimal algorithm [16] and improved niche immune algorithm [27]. Some focus on the game theory models [11,12]. Some others pay attention to multi-objective models and algorithms; for instance, Pareto group leader algorithm [14], cloud-entropy enhanced genetic algorithm [23], hybrid artificial bee colony algorithm [18,19], adaptive multi-population differential artificial bee colony algorithm [24], modified particle swarm optimization algorithm [25] and ε-dominance multi-objective evolutionary algorithm [28].In the above studies, novel objective functions attract more attention, and DM's preference for different objectives is rarely considered or simply expressed as a set of weight values [8,17].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It builds an extra computation for private clouds that allows users to perform workloads, that is, how to offload workloads from users to both public and private clouds [5]. Based on the concerns of public cloud service reliability and security, a hybrid cloud solution is proposed, which can make full use of public cloud resources to supplement the local private cloud resources [6]. Game theory of thought modeling can well analyze each player's strategy.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DF i,j , CS i,j , BS i,j 0.8540 C 10 DF i,j , CS i,j , QU i,j 0.7149 C 11 DF i,j , BS i,j , ME i,j 0.4255 C 12 NP i,j , MS i,j , SD i,j 0.9206 C 13 NP i,j , MS i,j , TC i,j 0.8757 C 14 NP i,j , MA i,j 0.4294 C 15 NP i,j , CS i,j , TC i,j 0.8521 C 16 NP i,j , ME i,j 0.8038 C 17 MS i,j , SD i,j , RU i,j 0.9946 C 18 MS i,j , RS i,j , TC i,j 0.1193 C 19 MS i,j , QU i,j 0.8209 C 20 MS i,j , TC i,j , RU i,j 0.5309 C 21 MA i,j , PE i,j 0.9671 C 22 MA i,j , RU i,j 0.6952 C 23 OD i,j , RU i,j 0.2307 C 24 SD i,j , TE i,j 0.7174 C 25 BS i,j , ME i,j , TE i,j 0.6907 C 26 RS i,j , ME i,j , TE i,j 0.8250 C 27 ME i,j , PE i,j 0.9906 …”
Section: Cliquementioning
confidence: 99%