2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.02.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supporting anticipation in driving through attentional and interpretational in-vehicle displays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kircher et al [121] reported that intermittent visual eco-driving information had shorter dwell time than continuous information did. Stahl et al [127] found that both attentional and interpretational in-vehicle displays could improve anticipatory performance for novice drivers but not for experienced drivers.…”
Section: Safetymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kircher et al [121] reported that intermittent visual eco-driving information had shorter dwell time than continuous information did. Stahl et al [127] found that both attentional and interpretational in-vehicle displays could improve anticipatory performance for novice drivers but not for experienced drivers.…”
Section: Safetymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Presenting the reason for a behavioural change seems especially relevant because it may not be perceived by the driver at that time. Current feasible implementations like the proposed anticipation aiding system by Stahl et al [42] highlight the relevance of providing such a cause. However, the authors did not provide theoretical foundation for choosing a causal cue, a proposal we made during the course of this research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There may be the opportunity to include anthropomorphism [8,63] not only on the way the vehicle looks, but also trying to readjust the pod's driving behaviour so it seems more human. It is also possible to improve the information provided to occupants to assure them that the vehicle is aware of any upcoming hazards [59].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%