2020
DOI: 10.3390/land9090295
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supporting Adaptive Connectivity in Dynamic Landscapes

Abstract: A central tenet of landscape conservation planning is that natural communities can be supported by a connected landscape network that supports many species and habitat types. However, as the planning environment, ecological conditions, and risks and stressors change over time, the areas needed to support landscape connectivity may also shift. We demonstrate an approach designed to assess functional and structural connectivity of an established protected area network that has experienced landscape and planning … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With increased computational power, we expect to see rapid progress in dynamic connectivity modeling with Circuitscape and Omniscape. As we see such advances, we recognize it is critical to keep building bridges between scientists, governments, and stakeholders [189][190][191], even as our increasing use of complex modeling approaches and new technology may make our work more challenging for partners to understand. Rather than complicating these important interactions, we hope these advances provide connectivity modelers with critical opportunities to iterate and learn more quickly, and to collaborate more broadly with practitioners and stakeholders.…”
Section: Faster Software Facilitates Data Exploration and Stakeholder Engagementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With increased computational power, we expect to see rapid progress in dynamic connectivity modeling with Circuitscape and Omniscape. As we see such advances, we recognize it is critical to keep building bridges between scientists, governments, and stakeholders [189][190][191], even as our increasing use of complex modeling approaches and new technology may make our work more challenging for partners to understand. Rather than complicating these important interactions, we hope these advances provide connectivity modelers with critical opportunities to iterate and learn more quickly, and to collaborate more broadly with practitioners and stakeholders.…”
Section: Faster Software Facilitates Data Exploration and Stakeholder Engagementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…-Multiple focal species approaches, which separately model connectivity for a set of species representing diverse ecological needs and combine them post hoc to identify shared connectivity priorities (e.g., Albert et al 2017;Meurant et al 2018;Jennings, Zeller, and Lewison 2020;Williamson et al 2019).…”
Section: Brennan Et Al 2020); Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specific attention to protecting and enhancing connectivity is necessary to increase the resilience of conservation areas and networks (Rudnick et al., 2012). Habitat connectivity is a central tenet of conservation planning (Boitani et al., 2007; Jennings et al., 2020) and is key for population viability (Correa et al., 2016) because it allows for ecological processes such as dispersal, movement, gene flow, migrations and repopulation of areas (Gilbert‐Norton et al., 2010; Rudnick et al., 2012). Connectivity also improves the chances that species will be able to adapt to changing climatic conditions (DeFries et al., 2005; Heller & Zavaleta, 2009; Krosby et al, 2010), which reduces extinction risks and minimizes the effects of environmental variability on small populations (Brown et al, 1977; Newmark, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%