CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2022
DOI: 10.1145/3491102.3517678
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supporting Accessible Data Visualization Through Audio Data Narratives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also learned a detailed set of challenges and considerations with numerous aspects of non-visual visual arts appreciation, centering on access modalities, visual concept comprehension, interpretation freedom, convenience, and social tensions. These considerations call to past work on multimodality (e.g., [22,70,78]), non-visual presentations of visual information (e.g., [77,112]), and social considerations of assistive technologies (e.g., [76,80,110]), but specifically provide guidance for visual arts presentations. In particular, these findings provide novel insights on what blind patrons want to learn about specific elements of visual arts (e.g., form, shape, or content), which of them should be presented in what modalities (e.g., haptics, audio, level of interactivity) (Section 6.1), persisting challenges with these modalities, and what types of social and interpretation goals are involved (Section 4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also learned a detailed set of challenges and considerations with numerous aspects of non-visual visual arts appreciation, centering on access modalities, visual concept comprehension, interpretation freedom, convenience, and social tensions. These considerations call to past work on multimodality (e.g., [22,70,78]), non-visual presentations of visual information (e.g., [77,112]), and social considerations of assistive technologies (e.g., [76,80,110]), but specifically provide guidance for visual arts presentations. In particular, these findings provide novel insights on what blind patrons want to learn about specific elements of visual arts (e.g., form, shape, or content), which of them should be presented in what modalities (e.g., haptics, audio, level of interactivity) (Section 6.1), persisting challenges with these modalities, and what types of social and interpretation goals are involved (Section 4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We demonstrate Erie's expressiveness by replicating accessibility and general-purpose sonification designs proposed by prior work (e.g., Audio Narrative [45], Chart Reader [47], and news articles [12]). We provide an interactive gallery with a variety of example sonification designs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…iGraph-Lite [21] provides keyboard interaction for reading line charts, and Chart Reader [47] extends this approach to other position-based charts and supports author-specified "data insights" that highlight certain parts of a given visualization and read out text-based insight descriptions. Siu et al [45] propose an automated method for splitting a line chart into several sequences and adding a template-based alternative text to each sequence. Agarwal et al [4] provide a touch-based interaction method for browsing data sonifications on mobile phones.…”
Section: Sonification Tools and Toolkitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, SAS [6] uses sonification with keyboard navigation where the values of each bar are represented by the pitch of the corresponding piano note. Sio et al [74] proposed a heuristics-based approach combining sonification with textual description to generate audio data narratives from a time-series dataset and Infosonics [39] presented an unconventional method to present the audio analogue of infographics combining interactive sonifications, spoken introduction, and harmonious notes. Wang et al [81] conducted experiments to find how different auditory channels affect the perception of visualization among people with visual impairments and they reported that pitch was the most instinctive channel to understand all data types (e.g., quantitative, ordinal, and nominal).…”
Section: Accessible Visualizationmentioning
confidence: 99%