2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102565
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supporting a shift in wildfire management from fighting fires to thriving with fires: The need for translational wildfire science

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To address this, wildfire decisions can aim to allocate resources, invest in infrastructure and encourage selforganisation at individual and community levels (Ostrom 1990;Djalante et al 2013;Dodd et al 2018;Uyttewaal et al 2023). Similarly, Tedim et al (2016, p. 147) articulate a need to shift away from the 'passive expectation of institutional intervention' in communities, towards investing in bottom-up wildfire prevention by encouraging community involvement (Kocher and Butsic 2017;Oliveira et al 2017;Tedim et al 2021;Wunder et al 2021;Uyttewaal et al 2023). Adaptive institutions encourage flexibility, selforganisation and learning to react to uncertainties and characteristics unique to the local level (Folke et al 2003(Folke et al , 2005Djalante et al 2013).…”
Section: Theme 3 Community-level Wildfire Impact: Invest Into Local A...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address this, wildfire decisions can aim to allocate resources, invest in infrastructure and encourage selforganisation at individual and community levels (Ostrom 1990;Djalante et al 2013;Dodd et al 2018;Uyttewaal et al 2023). Similarly, Tedim et al (2016, p. 147) articulate a need to shift away from the 'passive expectation of institutional intervention' in communities, towards investing in bottom-up wildfire prevention by encouraging community involvement (Kocher and Butsic 2017;Oliveira et al 2017;Tedim et al 2021;Wunder et al 2021;Uyttewaal et al 2023). Adaptive institutions encourage flexibility, selforganisation and learning to react to uncertainties and characteristics unique to the local level (Folke et al 2003(Folke et al , 2005Djalante et al 2013).…”
Section: Theme 3 Community-level Wildfire Impact: Invest Into Local A...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In settings where publicly funded science is a critical underpinning of policy and risk management, barriers to disciplinary integration have persisted due to a lack of coproduction between scientists, policymakers, and practitioners to produce usable science that contributes to coordinated and intentional deployment of resources and risk management activities (Bremer & Meisch, 2017; Briley et al., 2015; Buizer et al., 2016; Dilling & Lemos, 2011; Kirchhoff et al., 2013; Lemos et al., 2012; Meadow et al., 2015; Tedim et al., 2021). These barriers have led to what is sometimes referred to as “loading dock science” where research and information are dropped off and never taken up for applications that could give them impact far beyond the academic context (Cash et al., 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Now western society is slowly turning to these age old approaches to learn to live with fire (Mason et al., 2012). To do so, landscape fires should be managed more holistically to make communities and landscapes more fire resilient (Smith et al., 2016; Tedim et al., 2021; WFEC, 2014). This holistic approach finds a basis in the field of pyrogegraphy (Bowman et al., 2013) and integrated fire management (European Commission, 2018; FAO, 2006; Rego et al., 2021), that maximizes the benefits of fire and includes social, economic, cultural and ecological values in each step of the management cycle (prevention, preparedness, response, mitigation and recuperation).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%