1996
DOI: 10.1016/1381-1169(95)00167-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supported transition metal complexes for ethylene polymerization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The immobilization of metallocene/MAO systems on solid carriers is normally accompanied by a decrease in catalytic activity. The activity drop has been attributed to (1) geometric restrictions of monomer access to the active sites 1,2 or the limitation of metallocene-MAO interaction due to isolated confinement; 3 (2) the deactivation of metal centers during the immobilization, which results in low ratios of activeto-total transition metal centers; 4,5 and (3) a decrease in the propagation rate. 6 Occasionally, supported metallocene/MAO catalysts exhibit higher average activities than homogeneous ones due to more stable kinetic profiles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The immobilization of metallocene/MAO systems on solid carriers is normally accompanied by a decrease in catalytic activity. The activity drop has been attributed to (1) geometric restrictions of monomer access to the active sites 1,2 or the limitation of metallocene-MAO interaction due to isolated confinement; 3 (2) the deactivation of metal centers during the immobilization, which results in low ratios of activeto-total transition metal centers; 4,5 and (3) a decrease in the propagation rate. 6 Occasionally, supported metallocene/MAO catalysts exhibit higher average activities than homogeneous ones due to more stable kinetic profiles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…6 Occasionally, supported metallocene/MAO catalysts exhibit higher average activities than homogeneous ones due to more stable kinetic profiles. 4 It has long been known that catalyst morphology has a strong influence on the initial fragmentation and, hence, polymerization behavior of supported catalysts. 7,8 McDaniel 9 observed increases in the polymerization activity with increasing porosity of silicasupported chromium and Ziegler-Natta catalysts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Supported nickel catalysts for olefin polymerization have been described, either using ylide [26,27] or diimine chelate ligands. [28 -31] For both systems, the catalyst was supported before the polymerization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The change of selectivity towards polymerization observed with these diketonate nickel complexes after their anchoring on polystyrene resin has been previously observed by us [7,8] after an analogous heterogenization of other nickel complexes active in the homogeneous phase as oligomerization catalysts. This particular behavior can be related to the presence of the bulky polymeric ligand which is responsible for a more tight chelation [23] and, as a consequence, favors the propagation step to give a polymer with respect to ␤-hydrogen elimination, this requiring the liberation of a coordination vacant site from a less hindered intermediate [24] (Scheme 2).…”
Section: ␤-Diketonate Nickel Catalysts / 117mentioning
confidence: 53%
“…In this context, as an extention of our interest in the field of polymer-supported nickel catalysts [7,8], the present work deals with heterogenized nickel catalysts obtained by reaction of Ni(COD) 2 with crosslinked styrene/divinylbenzene (ST/DVB) polymer matrices functionalized with different ␤-diketone moieties (I-IV), and their use for ethylene as well as propylene activation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%