2008
DOI: 10.2528/pier08041803
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Support Vector Regression Machines to Evaluate Resonant Frequency of Elliptic Substrate Integrate Waveguide Resonators

Abstract: Abstract-In this paper an efficient technique for the determination of the resonances of elliptic Substrate Integrated Waveguide (SIW) resonators is presented. The method is based on the implementation of Support Vector Regression Machines trained using a fast algorithm for the computation of the resonant frequencies of SIW structures. Results for resonators with a wide range of parameters will be presented. A comparison with results obtained with Multi Layer Perceptron Artificial Neural Network and with full … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is argued that when NNSC model is learnt from image data, the learnt basis components have the properties of the spatial receptive fields of simple cells in the primary visual cortex [26]. So, the NNSC technique provides a principled method for using training data to determine the significant parts of an image, which has been successfully applied in image denoising and pattern recognition.…”
Section: Non-negative Sparse Codingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is argued that when NNSC model is learnt from image data, the learnt basis components have the properties of the spatial receptive fields of simple cells in the primary visual cortex [26]. So, the NNSC technique provides a principled method for using training data to determine the significant parts of an image, which has been successfully applied in image denoising and pattern recognition.…”
Section: Non-negative Sparse Codingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SVM based approaches have been shown to outperform conventional templatebased approaches, providing better generalization capabilities. For classification tasks, SVM has advantages of elegant mathematical tractability and working with a relatively small number of training samples [17][18][19][20]. But SVM cannot allow the number of supports to be adapted to the specific signal being characterized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both of these learning machines are powerful, efficient, and robust in solving these problems. They are able to be trained from learning set and to generalize the target characterize accurately [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%