2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2008.11.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Support vector machines (SVM) in near infrared (NIR) spectroscopy: Focus on parameters optimization and model interpretation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
125
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 233 publications
(129 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
125
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Support vector machines (SVMs) were used for classification modeling in the study. SVMs are proven to present good generalization performance and to be able to model complex nonlinear boundaries through the use of adapted kernel functions [38]. In this work, radial basis function was used and particle swarm optimization (PSO) based on fivefold cross-validation was adopted for optimization of the parameters in SVM [39][40][41].…”
Section: Rois Extraction Based On Pca and Maskingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Support vector machines (SVMs) were used for classification modeling in the study. SVMs are proven to present good generalization performance and to be able to model complex nonlinear boundaries through the use of adapted kernel functions [38]. In this work, radial basis function was used and particle swarm optimization (PSO) based on fivefold cross-validation was adopted for optimization of the parameters in SVM [39][40][41].…”
Section: Rois Extraction Based On Pca and Maskingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, specifying parameters G and C is the key step in the SVM because their combined values determine the boundary complexity and thus the classification performance. 36 In our research, the kernel width G was set to 0.15 and the penalty parameter was set to 100. 30 For the implementation of the training and modeling procedure, we employed the existing SVM library LIBSVM presented by Chang and Lin.…”
Section: Support Vector Machinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fact that these two methods showed poorer classification performance can be explained by the complexity of the problem where the three classes strongly overlap. The results provided for the SVM (91% test CCR) are the ones obtained by the authors on exactly the same data set (for details regarding SVM parameter optimization, we refer to Reference [9]). Even if the HDDA models show better CCR performance on this data set, the purpose here is more to demonstrate the potential of the method for real-life spectroscopy applications than to perform a formal comparison between the methods.…”
Section: Three-class Nir Data Setmentioning
confidence: 99%