2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.03.267
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Support Vector Machines in Urban Water Demand Forecasting Using Phase Space Reconstruction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They aimed to assess phase space reconstruction before the input variables combination design. They concluded that their approach could achieve satisfactory lag time which in turns improve the support vector machine model performance [26].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They aimed to assess phase space reconstruction before the input variables combination design. They concluded that their approach could achieve satisfactory lag time which in turns improve the support vector machine model performance [26].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…to ascertain the relationship between the input and output variables. The physical-based and black box models include conventional regression models [9], artificial neural networks (ANN) [14,20,30,31], feedforward neural networks (FNN) [22,32], general regression neural networks (GRNNs) [33,34], deep belief neural network (DBNN) [35], support vector machines (SVMs) [16,18,[36][37][38], gene expression programming (GEP) [39,40], adaptive neural fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) [41], Fourier analysis [7], hybrid models (e.g., combined wavelet) [23,42,43], fuzzy regression [44], fuzzy cognitive map learning method [45], epidemiology-based forecasting framework [46], temporal disaggregation [47], harmonic analysis [48], and wavelet de-noising [49].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, to compensate for several uncertainties associated with demand, this approach involves inclusion of large safety or peak factors which usually overestimates the actual water demand by as much as 100% (Shabani et al., 2016), with resulting high operation and maintenance costs and high prices for water. Furthermore, the conventional approach (classically based on the assumption of collinearity), does not usually account for nonlinearities which may be inherent in the contributing factors (House-Peters and Chang, 2011; Shabani et al., 2017). Another deficiency in the application of the conventional approach is the lack of a climate change perspective in the water demand planning phase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%