Support Vector Machines Applications 2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-02300-7_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Support Vector Machines for Neuroimage Analysis: Interpretation from Discrimination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a reference for the results obtained by the novel WeiRD approach, we chose to additionally perform support vector machine (SVM) classification, for two reasons. First, SVM is the most popular choice for neuroimaging classification problems . Second, SVM is still considered to perform best among many current classification techniques when computation time is considered and has been shown to robustly handle data with high dimensionality but few samples per class—two characteristics that are shared with the classification problems in the present study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…As a reference for the results obtained by the novel WeiRD approach, we chose to additionally perform support vector machine (SVM) classification, for two reasons. First, SVM is the most popular choice for neuroimaging classification problems . Second, SVM is still considered to perform best among many current classification techniques when computation time is considered and has been shown to robustly handle data with high dimensionality but few samples per class—two characteristics that are shared with the classification problems in the present study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The feature vectors extracted are normally used to train a classification model, e.g. the support vector machine (SVM) [4], [11], [12], [17], [23], [25], [26] and sparse representation [10], [15], [16], [18], [20], [24], to obtain the image label.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We considered two different classifier types: support vector machine (SVM 61 ) and weighted robust distance (WeiRD 16,62,63 ). SVM is arguably the most popular classifier in the context of neuroimaging 64 , as it robustly handles data with high dimensionality but few samples per class. We used the implementation provided by libsvm 65 with a radial basis function kernel.…”
Section: Unimodal Diagnostic Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%