Support persons’ views on remote communication and social media for people with communicative and cognitive disabilities

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to explore support persons' views on remote communication for persons with communicative and cognitive disabilities, and on factors enabling self-determination and participation. Materials and methods: Five focus groups with 21 support persons were conducted. They were recorded and transcribed and data were analyzed qualitatively using focus group analysis methodology. Results: The participants experience how remote communication can enable users to have increased control in their lives and how remote communication can enable self-determination and participation. Access to remote communication has a dual effect on safety. There are experiences about communicative rights of the users not being met and there is a need for better access to technology, information, and experts. There is also a need for more competence and coordination among staff and support to the users. Challenges emerge in the support persons' dedication to the users' right to communicate. Conclusion: People with communicative and cognitive disabilities need access to remote communication in order to have control over their own lives and to achieve self-determination and participation in society. Support persons carry a large responsibility and can provide valuable insights of users' communication situation. ä IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION Remote communication is important for safety; it is necessary to be able to call for help independently. To ensure the communicative rights of people with communicative and cognitive difficulties, professionals must provide assessments of standard technology or assistive technology for remote communication. There is a need for more support to and education of staff from the professions. The users themselves are also in need of long-term support. Support persons face ethical dilemmas regarding user safety on social media and internet and need guidelines and support.

Internet opportunities and risks for adolescents with intellectual disabilities: A comparative study of parents’ perceptions

“…Parents also requested more information and guidance in this study, which could be provided by occupational therapists. This however puts the occupational therapist in the position of acknowledging the need to keep up with digitalization as suggested by Larsson Lund and Nyman [3], and to advance their own digital knowledge to improve future practice and meet the needs of clients [39] particularly in supporting the development of digital competence in people with intellectual or cognitive disabilities to enable participation [40].…”

Internet use and digital participation in everyday life : Adolescents and young adults with intellectual disabilities

“…This indicates the risk of a lack of suitable support being given for text-based internet use, which would negatively affect the enablement of digital participation for adolescents with ID. Discrepancies have been found to hinder digital participation if targeted support is not given and if the persons providing support have insufficient knowledge of internet technology themselves (Buchholz, Ferm, & Holmgren, 2018;Molin, Sorbring, & Löfgren-Mårtenson, 2019;Ramsten et al, 2019).…”

Tecnologías Digitales para la atención de personas con Discapacidad Intelectual

“…Después de realizar una primera lectura de todas las referencias encontradas, identificamos un artículo que no respondía ni a los criterios de selección de las fases 2 y 3 de la Etapa 2 ni nos aportan información relevante para alcanzar los objetivos planteados (McSweeney-Feld, 2017). También se identificaron dos pares de artículos que trataban sobre el mismo estudio, pero aportando un punto de vista distinto o aludiendo a los diferentes objetivos de dichas investigaciones (Buchholz, Ferm y Holmgren, 2017;Buchholz, Ferm y Holmgren, 2018;Vuković et al, 2016;Vuković et al, 2018).…”