2005
DOI: 10.1201/9780824751982.ch2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Support Materials for Affinity Chromatography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, covalent immobilization can produce improper orientation, steric hindrance or multi-site attachment for an immobilized binding agent if proper coupling conditions are not selected. These effects, in turn, can lead to a change in actual or apparent activity for an immobilized protein [14,16,19,25,29,30]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, covalent immobilization can produce improper orientation, steric hindrance or multi-site attachment for an immobilized binding agent if proper coupling conditions are not selected. These effects, in turn, can lead to a change in actual or apparent activity for an immobilized protein [14,16,19,25,29,30]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This support was selected because of its good mechanical stability, fast mass transfer properties, ease of chemical modification for ligand attachment, and low non-specific binding for antibodies and many biological substances that are found in samples such as serum or plasma [15-17,29,36,41]. Silica with a nominal pore size of 300 Å was chosen to help maximize the amount of HSA (i.e., the immobilized protein analog) that could be immobilized to the support while also allowing good accessibility of the labeled antibodies to this immobilized analog [29,41,42]; for higher mass proteins, a larger pore size could also have been employed [41,43]. Silica with a particle diameter of 7 μm was used to provide good mass transfer rates for the binding of the labeled antibodies to the immobilized HSA [33,34].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the binding of one HSA with an antibody may have blocked the remaining site on the antibody and prevented, or at least slowed down, the interaction of this second region with immobilized HSA in the microcolumn. It is also possible that the size of the HSA-antibody complex (~140-150 Å) versus the pore size of the support (300 Å, prior to protein immobilization) may have created restricted diffusion or prevented this complex from reaching most of the immobilized HSA [41]. Such effects could have resulted in pseudo-monovalent behavior and a response that was still consistent with that predicted by Eqn.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IAC matrix should be easily modified for antibody attachment, and should be macroporous with uniform particle and pore size and good flow properties (Urh et al, 2009). A compromise should be achieved between pore size and surface area, as supports with small pore size have a large surface area, much of which may not be available for immobilization of antibody (Gustavsson and Larsson, 2006). In contrast, large pore support systems do not have accessibility problems, but may result in a low level of antibody attachment due to the small surface area.…”
Section: Solid Matrixmentioning
confidence: 99%