2019
DOI: 10.1109/tase.2018.2867230
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Support-Free Layered Process Planning Toward 3 + 2-Axis Additive Manufacturing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The major advantage of our approach compared with [27] is the ability to handle models with handle and loop topology (see the models in Fig.8). For example, when applying the algorithm of Xu et al [27] to the Kitten model of Fig.8, their flooding algorithm is stuck at the fourth region, as shown in Fig.9. When applying their method to the Bunny model with genus-zero topology, the result is similar to ours (see Fig.10), though our result has a slightly smaller J G .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The major advantage of our approach compared with [27] is the ability to handle models with handle and loop topology (see the models in Fig.8). For example, when applying the algorithm of Xu et al [27] to the Kitten model of Fig.8, their flooding algorithm is stuck at the fourth region, as shown in Fig.9. When applying their method to the Bunny model with genus-zero topology, the result is similar to ours (see Fig.10), though our result has a slightly smaller J G .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The planar clipping methodology employed in this work can process general models with a high-genus number, addressing the drawbacks in [28], [17], and [27], which could only process models with skeletal-tree structures. Additionally, the algorithm can be easily tailor-made to support a hardware system with only one rotational axis (e.g., the system shown in Fig.5(a)).…”
Section: B Our Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome the limitation of traditional additive manufacturing (AM), more and more researchers have been exploring both software and hardware solutions to eliminate the usage of supporting structures. For the former, Ke Xu [8] proposed a novel multidirectional process planning algorithm for five-axis AM; the core of the strategy was to decompose the model into support-free parts directly pertaining to the cusp-height constraint, each with its own build direction. Jun Zhang [9] developed an adaptive slicing algorithm that could export optimal slices without support structures for five-axis hybrid layered manufacturing.…”
Section: Of 15mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rotation angle is determined by the normal vector of the base cross-section S i . Assuming the current normal vector is n i ( x i , y i , z i ), the calculation process of the angle is the same that of Equations (7) and (8) in Section 2.2.4.…”
Section: G-code Outputmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ding et al [10] proposed a multi-directional slicing method based on the stereolithography (STL) format CAD model, using the decomposition-regrouping method to achieve unsupported printing, which is shown to be efficient and straightforward on various tests parts, especially for geometries with a large number of holes. Xu et al [11] decomposed the model into support-free parts directly on the cusp-height constraint, each with its unique build direction, and ultimately eliminated the use of support by taking advantage of the 5-axis MEX platform. Wu et al [12] proposed a five degrees of freedom wireframe printer to print arbitrary grids, developed and applied a collision-free algorithm for local minimum area motion on the edges, and completed the printing of arbitrary wireframe grids, reducing the printing time and material cost of the model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%