2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2021.120450
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Support and gas environment effects on the preferential oxidation of carbon monoxide over Co3O4 catalysts studied in situ

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
26
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
5
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of the Co3O4 catalyst, the crystallite size decreased upon formation of the CoO and the hcp Co phases, while the crystallite size of the fcc Co phase was comparable with that of the starting Co3O4 phase, indicating a possible cleavage of the particles during CO-PrOx. This is in agreement with the findings reported by Nyathi et al from their in situ PXRD-based CO-PrOx studies [16]. SEM-EDS analysis of the spent catalysts (Figure 4) shows a uniform distribution of the cations (i.e., Mg and Fe or Co), indicating that the cations remain in close proximity even after partial reduction (in the case of MgCo2O4).…”
Section: Spent Catalyst Characterisationsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In the case of the Co3O4 catalyst, the crystallite size decreased upon formation of the CoO and the hcp Co phases, while the crystallite size of the fcc Co phase was comparable with that of the starting Co3O4 phase, indicating a possible cleavage of the particles during CO-PrOx. This is in agreement with the findings reported by Nyathi et al from their in situ PXRD-based CO-PrOx studies [16]. SEM-EDS analysis of the spent catalysts (Figure 4) shows a uniform distribution of the cations (i.e., Mg and Fe or Co), indicating that the cations remain in close proximity even after partial reduction (in the case of MgCo2O4).…”
Section: Spent Catalyst Characterisationsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Assuming the Mars-van Krevelen (MvK) mechanism for CO oxidation, which requires the catalyst surface to be easily reduced (and re-oxidised) [45][46][47][48], it is possible that the low CO oxidation activity of the Fe-based oxides was caused by their less reducible nature. This has also been proposed for other less reducible catalysts that displayed low CO oxidation activity during CO-PrOx [11,16,49]. It can also be observed that the addition of Mg in the Fe-and Co-based oxide structure (i.e., MgFe 2 O 4 and MgCo 2 O 4 ) decreased the CO and O 2 conversions, as well as CO 2 yields below 250 • C. This decrease in the CO oxidation activity is consistent with the effect that Mg has on the reducibility of the catalysts (see H 2 -TPR profiles in Figure 3), i.e., the addition of Mg makes the Fe-and Co-based oxide less reducible.…”
Section: Co-prox Performance Evaluationsupporting
confidence: 55%
See 3 more Smart Citations