1993
DOI: 10.1177/0002716293527001003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supply-Side Explanations for Religious Change

Abstract: Traditional scholarship approaches religious history from the demand side, attributing developments to the shifting desires, perceptions, and circumstances of religious consumers. This article advocates an alternative, supply-side approach that emphasizes the opportunities and restrictions confronting religious organizations and their leaders. Supply shifts lie at the root of major religious changes in America. Colonial revivalists, Asian cult leaders, and contemporary televangelists all prospered when regulat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
98
0
5

Year Published

1998
1998
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 239 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
98
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The link between religious competition and religious activity has attracted considerable attention in the empirical literature on the economics of religion. Several authors find that competition results in higher religious participation (Finke and Iannaccone, 1993; for a survey on that literature see Sherkat and Ellison, 1999;Barro and McCleary, 2003), with opposing views from Olson (1999) and Voas (2002). If the link actually exists, we expect that low religious diversity should rather weaken religion's power to control people and to influence their social norms.…”
Section: Buddhism and Hinduismmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The link between religious competition and religious activity has attracted considerable attention in the empirical literature on the economics of religion. Several authors find that competition results in higher religious participation (Finke and Iannaccone, 1993; for a survey on that literature see Sherkat and Ellison, 1999;Barro and McCleary, 2003), with opposing views from Olson (1999) and Voas (2002). If the link actually exists, we expect that low religious diversity should rather weaken religion's power to control people and to influence their social norms.…”
Section: Buddhism and Hinduismmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The estimated coefficient of 0.87 (s.e.=0.14) in column 1 implies, if viewed causally, 21 that the imposition of a state religion would raise the monthly church attendance rate by 21 percentage points (starting from the mean of 36%). 22 This pattern conflicts with the one predicted in the religion-market model of Bainbridge (1987), Iannaccone (1991), Finke and Stark (1992), and Finke and Iannaccone (1993). In that view, state 21 One potential concern is that greater religiousness among the population might help to explain why a country has a state religion.…”
Section: Another Clear Pattern Inmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…During the twentieth century, leading theoretical paradigms in the sociology of religion emphasized Americans' ability to freely choose how to identify and enact their religious faith within a deregulated religious marketplace (see, for example, [2,3,[25][26][27]. As Edgell ([1], p. 249) notes, "Market theorists argue that modernity creates the conditions that foster religious privatization, pluralism, and voluntarism, causing religion to thrive-and, ironically, to retain much of its public significance."…”
Section: Religious Belonging In Black and White Christian Churchesmentioning
confidence: 99%