2010
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1703041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supply Responses to Digital Distribution: Recorded Music and Live Performances

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
61
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
61
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Another explanation would be additional income to creators/rights holders from related markets, such as live music, music licensing or merchandising (e.g. Mortimer et al, 2012). Suppliers could be adapting in order to mitigate adverse impacts of digital copying.…”
Section: Notementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another explanation would be additional income to creators/rights holders from related markets, such as live music, music licensing or merchandising (e.g. Mortimer et al, 2012). Suppliers could be adapting in order to mitigate adverse impacts of digital copying.…”
Section: Notementioning
confidence: 99%
“…While publishers may be harmed by piracy, artists may benefit from the increased recognition of their music that piracy brings about. The notion that piracy may increase concert revenues also has some empirical support (Oberholzer-Gee and Strumpf, 2010;Mortimer et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liebowitz (2008) uses sales of music and Internet connectedness across US cities and concludes that file sharing induces a decline on sales of a magnitude that is at least of the size of the observed decline. Oberholzer and Strumpf (2007) and Blackburn (2004) use album sales and the number of illegal downloads. Both papers use shocks in the supply of albums in peer-to-peer systems to address simultaneity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%