Supply Network Structure, Visibility, and Risk Diffusion: A Computational Approach

Abstract

Understanding and managing supply chain risks is a critical functional competency for today's global enterprises. A lack of this competency can have significant negative outcomes, including costly production and delivery delays, loss of future sales, and a tarnished corporate image. The ability to identify and mitigate risks, however, is complicated as supply chains are becoming increasingly global, complex, and interconnected. Drawing on the complex systems and epidemiology literature, and using a computational modeling and network analysis approach, we examine the impact of global supply network structure on risk diffusion and supply network health and demonstrate the importance of supply network visibility. Our results show a significant association between network structure and both risk diffusion and supply network health. In particular, our results indicate that small‐world supply network topologies consistently outperform supply networks with scale‐free characteristics. Theoretically, our study contributes to our understanding of risk management and supply networks as complex networked systems using a computational approach. Managerially, our study illustrates how decision makers can benefit from a network analytic approach to develop a more holistic understanding of system‐wide risk diffusion and to guide network governance policies for more favorable health level outcomes. The article concludes by highlighting the main findings and discussing possibilities of future research directions.

Viability of intertwined supply networks: extending the supply chain resilience angles towards survivability. A position paper motivated by COVID-19 outbreak

“…Finally, node/arc criticalities in SCs have attracted attention of researchers. Basole and Bellamy (2014) focused on the identification of 'healthy nodes' in the SC based on the level of risk diffusion. Chen, Xi, and Jing (2017) and Macdonald et al (2018) show that SC robustness and resilience should not merely be based on a straightforward disruption magnitude analysis, but rather seek trajectories of how different disruption scenarios influence the severity in network degradation and recovery (Pavlov et al 2019a).…”

Supply chain disruption propagation: a systemic risk and normal accident theory perspective

“…We define supply chain disruption propagation as the spread of the disruption effects beyond the initial disruption location. Other terminology for supply chain disruption propagation in the academic literature include risk diffusion (Basole and Bellamy 2014), cascading failures (Hearnshaw and Wilson 2013) and the Ripple Effect (Ivanov et al 2014a;2014b;Solokov et al 2016).…”

A Privacy Preserving Approach to Collaborative Systemic Risk Identification: The Use-Case of Supply Chain Networks

“…However, higher visibility in the network facilitates improved risk management [67]. Therefore, it might be necessary that firms agree on sharing more information than the BCs.…”