Abstract:We study the performance of a stylized supply chain where two firms, a retailer and a producer, compete in a Stackelberg game. The retailer purchases a single product from the producer and afterward sells it in the retail market at a stochastic clearance price. The retailer, however, is budget constrained and is therefore limited in the number of units that he may purchase from the producer. We also assume that the retailer's profit depends in part on the realized path or terminal value of some observable stoc… Show more
“…Apart from the multi-period inventory problems, the above modeling framework may also be applied to describe many other operational activities, such as production planning (Ding et al 2007), product sourcing (Caldentey and Haugh 2009), and materials distribution (Goel and Gutierrez 2011). Moreover, it is also possible to extend our model by introducing some capacity constraints on the decision vector k x (Birge 2000).…”
Section: An Illustrative Example: Commodity Procurement and Storage Umentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another contribution, Ding et al (2007) have investigated the implications of a global manufacturer's financial hedging activity against currency risk on its operational decisions. For other examples regarding the impacts of financial hedging on operational policies, see Caldentey and Haugh (2006), Caldentey and Haugh (2009), and references therein. However, these papers typically assume a newsvendor setting in their models (i.e., single-period problems), which may have limitations in practice.…”
“…Apart from the multi-period inventory problems, the above modeling framework may also be applied to describe many other operational activities, such as production planning (Ding et al 2007), product sourcing (Caldentey and Haugh 2009), and materials distribution (Goel and Gutierrez 2011). Moreover, it is also possible to extend our model by introducing some capacity constraints on the decision vector k x (Birge 2000).…”
Section: An Illustrative Example: Commodity Procurement and Storage Umentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another contribution, Ding et al (2007) have investigated the implications of a global manufacturer's financial hedging activity against currency risk on its operational decisions. For other examples regarding the impacts of financial hedging on operational policies, see Caldentey and Haugh (2006), Caldentey and Haugh (2009), and references therein. However, these papers typically assume a newsvendor setting in their models (i.e., single-period problems), which may have limitations in practice.…”
“…The operations management literature has been prolific on newsvendor models (see Chen and Bell (2009);Chung et al (2009);Hu et al (2010); Lau and Lau (1999); Parlar and Weng (2003); Zhou and Wang (2009)) on which our model is based; however, most studies on the interface between operations and financial management have been recent (Caldentey and Haugh, 2009). The existing literature has focused on the budget-constrained firm's production, inventory, capacity, and debt decisions, and seeks to demonstrate that it is important to incorporate financial decisions into operational decisions.…”
Integrated logistics and financial services have been practiced by third party logistics (3PL) firms for years; however, the literature has been silent on the value of 3PL firms as credit providers in budget-constrained supply chains. This paper investigates an extended supply chain model with a supplier, a budget-constrained retailer, a bank, and a 3PL firm, in which the retailer has insufficient initial budget and may borrow or obtain trade credit from either a bank (traditional role) or a 3PL firm (control role). Our analysis indicates that the control role model yields higher profits not only for the 3PL firm but also for the supplier, the retailer, and the entire supply chain. In comparison with a supplier credit model where the supplier provides the trade credit, the control role model yields a better performance for the supply chain as long as the 3PL firm's marginal profit is greater than that of the supplier. We further demonstrate that, for all players, both the control role and supplier credit models can outperform the classic newsvendor model without budget constraint.
“…Since the financial hedging is a financial topic, this literature in the global supply chain environment is relatively lacking. Caldentey and Haugh (2009) consider the flexible contract with hedging in a decentralized global supply chain. Ding, Dong and Kouvelis (2007) discusses the financial hedging and the operational hedging at the same time in a global supply chain network.…”
Abstract:Purpose: The main propose of this study is to investigate how exchange rate risk affects the buy-back and revenue-sharing contracts in the global supply chain, hence to improve the performance of global supply chain.Design/methodology/approach: Based on a two-echelon global supply chain, with the model equilibrium, this paper studies the difference between the buy-back contract and the revenue-sharing contract. By the transmitting of the exchange rate risk, it discusses the nodeenterprises' optimal strategies.
Findings:The result shows that: (1) Both these two contracts can diminish the inefficiency caused by demand risk, but none of them can manage the exchange rate risk. (2) No matter which currency is used to settle the payment, both these two contracts will lead to the transmitting of exchange rate risk from one node-enterprise to another. (3) When the currency of the supplier's country in the relatively appreciating, it is better to use the buy-back contract; when the currency of the supplier's country in the relatively depreciating, the revenue-sharing contract will lead to a better result.
Research limitations/implications:Though this study analyzes how the exchange rate risk affects these two contracts, it based on the assumption that node-enterprises' goal is maximizing theirs expected profit. In fact, many firms not only focus on maximizing theirs -1218-Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management -http://dx.doi.org/10.3926/jiem.1391 expected profit; the risk-taking is also an important concern. For future researches, how firms' risk-preferences affects theirs decisions in the global supply chain will be an interesting question. Also, will there be any difference if consider the node-enterprises' utility functions instead of the expected profit.Originality/value: Existing literature about the global supply chain mainly focus on the exchange rate risk management, few of them considers the double marginalization effect caused by the demand risk. Therefore, with the exchange rate fluctuation, we discuss the difference between the buy-back contract and the revenue-sharing contract.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.