Supply Contract Design with Asymmetric Corporate Social Responsibility Cost Information in Service Supply Chain

Abstract

Corporate social responsibility (CSR) has become the focus of the company’s daily operations and strategic choices. At present, the supply risk events caused by the CSR violations of service providers in the service supply chain are frequent, which highlight the importance of formulating appropriate contracts to constrain the CSR level of providers. In the context of asymmetric CSR cost information, this paper analyzes the optimal contract parameters of integrators when providing screening contracts or pooling contracts and compares their impact on profits and the CSR level. The information asymmetry belongs to classic principal-agent problem, and we will use the revelation principle to design the contracts and solve this problem. The results that different contracts have different effects on the CSR level of different types of providers. A low-cost provider’s CSR level is the highest when a screening contract is provided, while a high-cost provider’s CSR level reaches the peak under a pooling contract. If pursuing profit maximization, the integrator should choose to provide a screening contract. When the integrator needs to ensure a higher average level of social responsibility, a pooling contract should be chosen. The findings also show that service cost is an important factor affecting the CSR level of the provider, and only when the providers’ service cost is low, will providers actively fulfill their social responsibility.

The Impact of ESG Performance on Firm Value: The Moderating Role of Ownership Structure

“…Solving the principal-agent problem enables firms to improve operation efficiency and decision execution. Ownership structure affects business activities through the perspectives of agency costs, operating costs and management efficiency, which, in turn, facilitate or hinder the role of ESG performance on corporate value [59,60]. In companies with higher ownership concentration, decision makers are more inclined to make decisions for long-term corporate development [61], thus, increasing the efficiency of ESG performance on corporate value.…”

Corporate social responsibility in long‐term supply chain management

“…Ye et al (2015) explored the supply chain CSR management of nutrition food market from the perspective of consumers. Liu, Wei, et al (2019) analyzed the optimal contract parameters of integrator when providing screening contracts or pooling contracts and compared their impact on profits and the CSR level in the context of asymmetric CSR cost information.…”

Is ESG Companies' Performance Influenced by Ownership Structure? Evidence in ASEAN

“…The company ownership structure can leads to firm governance improvement as shareholders play monitoring role of decision control related to each stakeholders' interest (Huang et al, 2022). Ownership structure affects business activities through the perspectives of agency costs, operating costs and management efficiency, which, in turn, facilitate or hinder the role of ESG performance on corporate value (Liu et al, 2019).…”