2021
DOI: 10.1108/scm-08-2020-0407
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supply chain sustainability learning: the COVID-19 impact on emerging economy suppliers

Abstract: Purpose This paper aims to investigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on supply chain (SC) sustainability learning. In particular, it focuses on the learning associated with changes in the sustainability initiatives of emerging economy suppliers. Design/methodology/approach Through studying three scenarios (pre-outbreak, buyer-centred peak and supplier-centred peak) over a nine-month period, a multi-case study strategy was used to gain an understanding of the learning of export-oriented Brazilian coffee… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
73
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
1
73
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent research into knowledge transfer regarding sustainability initiatives has either examined only a subset of these three processes, or has considered absorptive capacity holistically without unpacking the detailed role of each process. For example, Tong et al (2018) discussed absorptive capacity as a unified concept to understand whether suppliers implement sustainability practices, while Pereira et al (2021) limited their discussion to the roles of explorative and exploitative learning without considering the transformative learning process. More specifically, in the context of learning stimulated by the Covid-19 pandemic, Pereira et al (2021) found that suppliers enter the learning loop using an exploitative learning process of external knowledge and that subsequent learning loops involve both explorative and exploitative learning regarding social sustainability practices.…”
Section: Supplier Absorptive Capacitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent research into knowledge transfer regarding sustainability initiatives has either examined only a subset of these three processes, or has considered absorptive capacity holistically without unpacking the detailed role of each process. For example, Tong et al (2018) discussed absorptive capacity as a unified concept to understand whether suppliers implement sustainability practices, while Pereira et al (2021) limited their discussion to the roles of explorative and exploitative learning without considering the transformative learning process. More specifically, in the context of learning stimulated by the Covid-19 pandemic, Pereira et al (2021) found that suppliers enter the learning loop using an exploitative learning process of external knowledge and that subsequent learning loops involve both explorative and exploitative learning regarding social sustainability practices.…”
Section: Supplier Absorptive Capacitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Governments-both in the North and South-need to enforce international labour standards and best practice guidelines concerning social sustainability to protect women's rights and to ensure adequate working conditions for women to effectively help address issues such as poverty, gender equity, and the overall wellbeing of women in the workforce [77]. Pereira et al [18] argued that, while government support is instrumental for companies operating in lower-and middle-income countries to address the impacts of the pandemic, timely and effective support was mostly lacking concerning social issues. Hence, public policymakers need to acknowledge governments' central role in enhancing social sustainability and to develop policies that can assist companies in the development and implementation of effective recovery plans.…”
Section: Policy Implications-the Role Of Governmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Masselot and Hayes [17] (p. 57) noted that "gender issues, in particular, are at the very core of the COVID-19 pandemic". Similarly, a recent study by Pereira et al [18] revealed that social sustainability should be the main priority of suppliers during the COVID-19 pandemic in order to go beyond meeting the predominant sustainability certification standard requirements and promoting substantive social sustainability initiatives targeting social inequalities and vulnerabilities in global supply chains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sustainability in food supply chains has always been a difficult issue [6]. Supply chains have been adversely affected around the world, especially in uncertain times such as the COVID-19 pandemic, with emerging restrictions and business interruptions, and the sustainability of supply chains is facing disruption [8]. In particular, the food supply chain faces difficulties from the first to the last stage [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The restrictions brought by the COVID-19 pandemic make it difficult for farmers to access the inputs that constitute the first stage of the food supply chain and affect the production capacity, and also logistical problems arise in the food supply chain [10]. In addition, there are many problems such as the uncertainties in the current situation caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, difficulty in accessing raw materials in food supply chains [8], loss of cooperation between suppliers, communication problems experienced in the processes i.e., [10]. This uncertain time threatens the sustainable food supply chain [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%