Supply chain sustainability and performance of firms: A meta-analysis of the literature

Govindan, Kannan; Rajeev, A.; Padhi, Sidhartha S.; Pati, Rupesh Kumar

doi:10.1016/j.tre.2020.101923

Cited by 148 publications

(119 citation statements)

References 98 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The main goal of SSCM is the integration of environmentally and socially viable practices into the full supply chain lifecycle, from product design and development, to material selection, manufacturing, packaging, transportation, warehousing, distribution, consumption, return and disposal. Govindan et al (2020) and Golicic and Smith (2013) found a positive impact of SSCM on financial performance. Moreover, the branch of industry (manufacturing) (Govindan et al 2020;Golicic and Smith 2013), measurements of SSCM, region and time (Golicic and Smith 2013) represent relevant moderator variables.…”

Section: Financial Performancementioning

confidence: 96%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Meta-analyses on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): a literature review

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper addresses quantitative meta-analyses on corporate governance-related determinants and firms’ (non) financial consequences of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). Legitimacy theory as our theoretical framework assumes that, through a social contract, a company must fulfil the respective society’s values and expectations and gain legitimacy. We also rely on the business case argument, assuming a positive relationship between CSR and financial outcomes of the firm. This analysis focusses on 54 quantitative meta-analyses on CSR and includes a structured literature review in order to increase our knowledge, which corporate governance variables and proxies of firm’s (non) financial outcome have been heavily included in archival research, and if there is an overall impact of these variables. Prior meta-analyses indicate that board independence, board gender diversity, and board size have a positive impact on CSR performance. Moreover, both CSR performance and environmental performance increase financial performance. This literature review makes a useful contribution to prior studies by summarizing the overall impact of corporate governance variables on CSR and their (non) financial consequences and by deducing recommendations for future research.

show abstract

Section: Financial Performancementioning

confidence: 96%

“…Govindan et al (2020) and Golicic and Smith (2013) found a positive impact of SSCM on financial performance. Moreover, the branch of industry (manufacturing) (Govindan et al 2020;Golicic and Smith 2013), measurements of SSCM, region and time (Golicic and Smith 2013) represent relevant moderator variables.…”

Section: Financial Performancementioning

confidence: 96%

Meta-analyses on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): a literature review

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Environmental, economic and social studies that constitute the basic dimensions of sustainable development are evaluated under this study in terms of sustainable development through AHP and SWOT analyses. There is a substantially broad literature on broadening the scope of SWOT-AHP based on sustainable development, economy, industry, supply chain and selection practices in terms of economic and social sustainability (Awasthi et al, 2018 ; Bas, 2013 ; Calabrese et al, 2019 ; Centobelli et al, 2017 ; Dania et al, 2018 ; Govindan et al, 2014 , 2020a , 2020b , 2020c ; Kim & Park, 2019 ; Lenis Escobar et al, 2020 ; Mangla et al, 2018 ; Mani et al, 2014 ; Raza et al, 2018 ; Tavana et al, 2016 ). There have been numerous attempts elaborating on the AHP and SWOT connection within the scope of environmentally sustainable development such as the selection of potential areas and suitable routes in various areas according to geographic features (Coruhlu et al, 2020 ; Datta, 2020 ; De La Vega et al, 2018 ; Kumari & Pandey, 2020 ), sustainable environmental relationship and appropriate agricultural land location selection (Feng, 2020 ; Sarı & Koyuncu, 2021 ), sustainable energy and environmental impact assessment (Anser et al, 2020 ; Ervural et al, 2018 ; Solangi et al, 2019 ; Wang et al, 2020 ), natural resource sustainability (Kajanus et al, 2012 ), sustainable tourism (Asadpourian et al, 2020 ; Fabac & Zver, 2011 ; Kişi, 2019 ; Najafinasab et al, 2020 ; Navarro-Martínez et al, 2020 ; Zorlu & Yılmaz, 2020 ) and residential areas sustainability (Esmaeilzadeh et al, 2020 ; Fatourehchi & Zarghami, 2020 ; Kramar et al, 2019 ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sustainable development goals assessment of Erzurum province with SWOT-AHP analysis

Kaymaz

Birinci

Kızılkan

2021

Environ Dev Sustain

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Sustainable development is one of the issues that many developed and developing countries focus on in the world. The sustainability of human and natural resources is of great importance for securing the world and humanity's common future. In this context, this study aims to evaluate the socio-economic structure of Erzurum with analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and digitized strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats analysis considering sustainable development goals (SDGs). The items included in the Agenda 21 report of the United Nations and 17 SDGs determined by the United Nations were taken into consideration in this endeavour. In line with expert opinions, the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats created by the sustainable development goals for Erzurum province were analysed statistically with the AHP. Priority and weighted values of each sub-criterion were calculated. According to this analysis, “the richness of natural, cultural and historical resources for tourism potential” ranks first among the strengths of the province regarding sustainable development goals. Weaknesses include “insufficient investment and entrepreneurial culture”. However, “priority region status for development” criterion stands out as the most important opportunity. Threats include “loss of labour force due to migration from agricultural areas” criterion. After the statistical analysis, the quantitative results of made for the best realization of sustainable development for the area were assessed to specify new goals and strategies. Suggestions were offered to define opportunities and strengths, threats and weaknesses with new-build strategies and to make the plans accordingly.

show abstract

“…When the literature is analyzed, it is seen that there are some similar studies on sustainable supplier selection. Kannan et al (2020b) accepted in their study carried out in 2020, priorities of many criteria were determined based on economic, social, and circular factors as three dimensions of sustainability. It is seen that the economic criterion has the highest value.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sustainable Supply Chain: A Gradation Model That Based on AHP-TOPSIS Method

Demirkol¹

2021

Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study is to determine the sustainable supplier selection criteria through the literature research and to choose the best sustainable supplier with the AHP-Topsis method. Nowadays, a sustainable supply chain has become one of the main methods of supply chain management when the growth of information about sustainability in companies bore in mind. Studies about assessment and evaluation of sustainability create the main requirement in sustainable supply chain management. In this study, Economic, social and environmental main criteria and 17 sub criteria have been determined. Weights of criteria are evaluated with methods of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) As a result of the study, The universe of the research consists of all enterprises affiliated to Bursa Chamber of Industry and Commerce. The research sample consists of a business affiliated to Bursa Chamber of Commerce and Industry. it's been determined that the most important main criterion is "Economical", for the sub criteria, these are "Quality", "Human Rights" and "Green Production". As a result of the analysis, Supplier 4 is chosen as the one who has the highest score among all the existing suppliers of the company.

show abstract

Supply chain sustainability and performance of firms: A meta-analysis of the literature

Cited by 148 publications

References 98 publications

Meta-analyses on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): a literature review

Meta-analyses on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): a literature review

Sustainable development goals assessment of Erzurum province with SWOT-AHP analysis

Sustainable Supply Chain: A Gradation Model That Based on AHP-TOPSIS Method

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About