Supply chain management and the circular economy: towards the circular supply chain

Angelis, Roberta De; Howard, Mickey; Miemczyk, Joe

doi:10.1080/09537287.2018.1449244

Cited by 414 publications

(283 citation statements)

References 102 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

276

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…However, these authors claim a need for "a more comprehensive analysis" to capture "the full range of contributions and different perspectives in the area". As Circular Economy research is developed throughout different disciplines such as environmental economic and management science (De Angelis et al, 2018) Can knowledge about benefits of reverse logistics, closed loops, industrial symbiosis and industrial ecology, Cradle to Cradle, and life-cycle assessment be aggregated and applied to expand the social and business case for circular economy? Some authors simply assume that is the case.…”

Section: Circular Economymentioning

confidence: 99%

Circular economy: benefits, impacts and overlapping

Sehnem

Vázquez‐Brust

Pereira³

et al. 2019

SCM

146

114

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose This paper aims to investigate overlaps, complementarities and divergences between the literature on circular economy (CE) models and related literature in non-linear production models and frameworks, including CE, reverse logistics, closed-loop, industrial symbiosis and industrial ecology. Design/methodology/approach A systematic literature review was conducted focussing on the benefits of non-linear modes adoption. Findings The results show a high degree of convergence in findings, gaps and weaknesses of these literatures. Negative environmental, economic and operational impacts are understudied. There is a scarcity of studies identifying practices resulting in empirically tested benefits. The business and society case for non-linear production is still largely built upon conceptual studies, modelling and a few case studies. Despite a normative focus, there is very little use of theory, in particular, management theories. Research limitations/implications First, the authors use only one, albeit highly recognized database, Scopus. This database may have omitted some relevant research, journals such as the Journal of Cleaner Production and Resources Conservation & Recycling that are more likely to publish such research and also have a more interdisciplinary approach. This is an important gap and interesting result to claim for more interdisciplinary research. Second, the filtering process used and the focus on Association of Business Schools top journals may have also omitted some relevant research, such as a large stream of literature in specialist journals such as Resources Conservation and Recycling and the Journal of Cleaner Production. Practical implications There are contradictions, tensions and epistemological ambiguity that needs to be critically addressed. Such tensions may be associated with the knowledge field that gave rise to these different non-linear production approaches. Many of them appeared at the same time, but from different sciences and disciplines with their own perspectives. Then in doing so, they create confusion in the definitions of CE, assumptions underlying modelling and business choices arising from this complexity. This can be minimized through the critical interpretation of knowledge to elucidate epistemological quandaries to improve the understanding of the economic, social and environmental impacts of practices. Social implications In some way, this result makes sense, as the authors have limited the search to management, business and accounts journals, especially talking about Operations Management journals. This is an important gap and interesting result to claim for more interdisciplinary research. Originality/value In addition to gaps previously described, the authors identified areas of tensions where the literature offers inconclusive – often contradictory – findings requiring further exploration. A better understanding of these tensions is required to understand the impacts of non-linear production and develop policy guidelines for industry and policymakers to scale-up CE.

show abstract

Section: Circular Economymentioning

confidence: 99%

Circular economy: benefits, impacts and overlapping

Sehnem

Vázquez‐Brust

Pereira³

et al. 2019

SCM

146

114

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…One is based on extending the durability of products or increasing the amount of remanufacturing, repair, renovation, and recycling cycles. The second would be the extension of the period of time during which the materials are kept in use [41].…”

Section: The Conceptualization Of Circular Supply Chainmentioning

confidence: 99%

Main Dimensions in the Building of the Circular Supply Chain: A Literature Review

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Circular economy is an alternative to the traditional production model and has therefore attracted a great deal of attention from researchers. The change in the production system is accompanied by new logistical needs related both to resources and waste and to the distribution and recovery of products. The circular supply chain involves return processes and the manufacturer intends to capture additional value in the supply chain. In this paper, value chains have been mapped to visualize the links and interactions between the different stages and actors to understand the complexities of these systems and to make informed decisions. For this reason, and based on thorough literature review, the final objective of this work is to achieve a conceptual framework to study circular supply chain, which uses the main theoretical perspectives in strategic management literature. Four dimensions have been identified to support the development of these new supply chains—greater intensity in the relationships established in the supply chain, adaptation of logistics and organizational, disruptive and smart technologies, and a functioning environment. It can be concluded that to develop a new relationship capacity will allow for reaching more frequent, closer relationships with more actors. These relationships will be developed within an adapted organizational and logistical framework that is framed in new business model archetypes. However, dimensions related to the business environment such as sectoral, legislative, and fiscal frameworks must be incorporated.

show abstract

“…Recycling involves the recovery of materials without contamination, to serve as raw materials for subsequent production systems of the same or similar quality products [70]. This model leans towards circular supply chain management as the concept that minimizes the amount of waste and maximizes the possibility of material reuse [94,95].…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Implementing Sustainable Supply Chain Management: Reactive, Cooperative, and Dynamic Models

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this research is to propose a Sustainable Supply Chain Management (SSCM) implementation framework grounded in a literature review while categorizing practices adopted by firms’ and industries. Given the evolution of the SSCM field and emerging trends, we examine why and how companies implement SSCM practices within a country context. The research methods employed in this study include theory building from a review of the literature and synthesis of insights regarding the design of SSCM implementation frameworks using multiple cases in Taiwan. The review of the literature, content analysis, and findings provide new insights into designing an implementation model, and generalizable models for reactive, cooperative, and dynamic SSCM implementation. Practical implications include but are not limited to the generalization of implementation frameworks in supply chain management, and opportunities to improve global practices. Our development of the conceptual framework complements existing theory by offering new knowledge on SSCM implementation practices. This study can help guide research, practitioners, and policymakers in future sustainability and supply chain management initiatives.

show abstract

Supply chain management and the circular economy: towards the circular supply chain

Cited by 414 publications

References 102 publications

Circular economy: benefits, impacts and overlapping

Circular economy: benefits, impacts and overlapping

Main Dimensions in the Building of the Circular Supply Chain: A Literature Review

Implementing Sustainable Supply Chain Management: Reactive, Cooperative, and Dynamic Models

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About