Supply chain learning, integration, and flexibility performance: an empirical study in India

Abstract

Purpose Supply chain flexibility has been acknowledged as a necessity in the context of constantly changing operational and service requirements in the global marketplace. However, limited research has focused on analyzing and empirically testing the dynamics of achieving enhanced flexibility performance. Drawing upon the knowledge-based view of the firm, the purpose of this paper is to address this research gap by introducing supply chain learning (SCL) and integration as key factors in the process. Design/methodology/approach Survey data were collected in India. Structural equation modeling technique was used as the main analysis method to test the proposed conceptual model on SCL, integration, and flexibility performance. Findings Research findings indicate that the supply chain integration construct (in its internal and external dimensions) mediates the proposed SCL-flexibility performance relationship. The analysis also confirms the positive relationship between cross-functional integration and inter-firm integration. Research limitations/implications Focusing on only one country may limit the generalizability of the findings. Also, cross-sectional data collection may not be the ideal approach for evaluating the impacts of SCL. Therefore, future research with longitudinal data and in different contexts is warranted to validate the research results of this study. Originality/value The proposed conceptual model adds to the limited existing knowledge body of SCL and links SCL, integration, and flexibility performance. It also provides a new venue for future research in this area.

Understanding the Blockchain technology adoption in supply chains-Indian context

“…The researchers acknowledge the support extended by the alumni of National Institute of Industrial Engineering (NITIE), Mumbai working in the SCM domain of the above companies in improving the response rate. The sample of 181 respondents satisfies the minimum requirement of five observations per parameter (Bentler and Chou 1987;Bollen 1989;Willis, Genchev, and Chen 2016). In our study, we have 33 parameters with a minimum sample size requirement of 165 respondents.…”

The impact of information sharing on supply chain learning and flexibility performance

“…The acquisition of information and knowledge empowers firms to design production systems more flexible by better predicting and responding to the challenges of uncertain and dynamic environments (Huo, Gu, and Wang 2018;Núñez-Merino et al 2020;Santos-Vijande, López-Sánchez, and Trespalacios 2012). The ability to learn from SC partners can help firms remain flexible by maintaining a wider knowledge base and developing their core competencies to better manage their operations (Chan and Chan 2009;Willis, Genchev, and Chen 2016). However, limited knowledge has been obtained on the mechanisms behind how SC learning influences flexibility performance.…”

Embracing green innovation via green supply chain learning: The moderating role of green technology turbulence

“…Supply chain learning refers to activities that a firm looks both upstream and downstream of its supply chain to manage and monitor the internal and external learning processes (Flint, Larsson, & Gammelgaard, 2008;Hernández-Espallardo, Rodríguez-Orejuela, & Sánchez-Pérez, 2010). Although the importance of supply chain learning has been recognized (Gong et al, 2018;Willis, Genchev, & Chen, 2016), our understanding of how and under what conditions it impact on green innovation is still limited. Thus, two research questions can be extracted.…”