Supply chain enhancement through product and vendor development programme

Mahmood, Wan Mohd Faizal Wan; Tahar, Nurulain Mat; Rahman, Mohd Nizam Ab; Baba,; Deros,

doi:10.1108/17465661111149566

Cited by 15 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…To deal the contextual issues from the literature of SS problem such as the area of application, Jiao Yuan-Yuan et al (2008) proposed the earlier supplier involvement models in the perspective of product development under semiconductor manufacturing firms. Hasrulnizzam Wan Mahmood et al (2011) reviewed the methodology in the area of the automotive manufacturers through a vendor development program. Kumar et al (2011) considered the packaging of materials for the consumer packaged food industry for developing the SS process through cost modeling.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Dynamic supplier selection approach for mining equipment company

Ahmad¹

2019

JM2

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose This paper aims to address the supplier selection (SS) problem under dynamic business environments to optimize the procurement cost of spare-parts in the context of a mining equipment company (MEC). Practically, involved parameters’ value does not remain constant as planning periods due to fluctuation in the demand and their market dynamics. Therefore, dynamicity in the parameter is considered as an important factor when a company forms a responsive chain through most eligible suppliers with respect to planning periods. This area of study may be considered for their complexities to the approaches toward order-allocations with bi-products of unused and repair spare-parts. Design/methodology/approach An integrated methodology of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and mixed-integer non-linear programming (MILP) is implemented in the two stages during each planning periods. In the first stage, AHP is used to obtain the relative weights with respect to each spare-parts of each criterion and based on that, the ranking is evaluated in accordance with case considered. And in the second stage, MILP is formulated to find the allocations of each spare-part with two distinct approaches through Model-1 and Model-2 separately. Moreover, Model-1 and Model-2 are outlined based on the ranking and efficient parameters-value under cost, limited capacities, quality level and delay lead time respectively. Findings The ranking and their optimal order-allocation of potential suppliers are obtained during consecutive planning periods for both unused and repair spare-parts. Subsequently, sensitivity analysis is conducted to deduce the key nuggets with the comparison of Model-1 and Model-2 in the changing of capacity, demand and cost per spare-parts. From this analysis, it is found that suppliers who have optimal parameter settings would be better for order-allocations than ranking during the changing planning period. Practical implications This paper points out the situation-specific approach for SS problem for a mining industry which often faces disruptive supplying environments. The managerial implication between ranking and parameters are highlighted through Model-1 and Model-2 by sensitivity analysis. Originality/value It provides useful directions for managers who are involved in the procurement of spare-parts in the mining environment. For this, suppliers are selected for order-allocation by using Model-1 and Model-2 in the dynamic business environment. The solvability of the model is presented using LINGO 17. Furthermore, the case company selected in this study can be extended to other sectors.

show abstract

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Dynamic supplier selection approach for mining equipment company

Ahmad¹

2019

JM2

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In this case, if minor issues are detected then the buyer can decide at the very outset what training is required by the supplier (Aslan et al, 2011). Involving suppliers in product development can result in major benefits in terms of money and time, but it requires a substantial thinking and effort (Hasrulnizzam et al, 2011).…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Long-term commitment helps to improve supplier's capabilities and knowledge transfer from the buyer to the supplier (Wagner and Krause, 2008). Product and vendor development programs also get influenced by long-term commitment for successful execution (Hasrulnizzam et al, 2011).…”

Section: Long-term Commitmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Critical Success Factors for Supplier Development and Buyer Supplier Relationship

Sarang

Bhasin

Verma

et al. 2016

International Journal of Strategic Decision Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Development of supplier base is becoming mandatory for buyers, as it is not possible to manufacture all components in house, or to search new supplier every time. It is recommended that supplier base of buyer should be self-efficient and developed one to achieve competitive advantages. This development of supplier can be achieved by applying different supplier development practices and buyer supplier relationship practices as per the requirement. In this article, Exploratory Factor analysis (EFA) is applied for grouping the critical success factors with their items by using SPSS software. 6 factors viz., Drivers for Supplier Development Practices, Supplier Development Practices, Buyer supplier Relationship Practices, Buyer supplier Relationship Improvement, Competitive Advantages and Profitability were formed with their respective items. The multi-item scale shows strong evidence of reliability as well as convergent, discriminant validity in a sample. EFA and Reliability Analysis were applied on data for validation of instrument. Data from 87 respondents working in manufacturing sector were used for analysis.

show abstract

“…The development of the QCD unit can also be supported by various indicators [19], but other evaluation processes may also support the monitoring of progress [20,21]; it is not uncommon for even a contract between business partners to fix a review of the QCD [22].…”

Section: General Introduction Of the Qcd Modelmentioning

confidence: 99%

Three-dimensional QCD framework of supply chain

Sipos

Pató

2022

IRASE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study focuses on the supply chain actors’ QCD framework. The authors present an innovative tool that illustrates the operating system of different actors in the supply chain by combining virtual and physical reality. The study aims to present and “visualize” the QCD coherence system with the help of the PaTeNt© – QCD spatial model. The study, therefore, focuses on the supplier, the central company; the relationship between the supply chain actors and the QCD framework, which is suitable for the agile, proactive collaboration. The parts of the model, which is the result of the development: the elements of quality, the elements of cost, the elements of delivery. The development of the model was brought to life by the tasks which need to be solved and this model helps the understanding and transparency during the work.

show abstract

Supply chain enhancement through product and vendor development programme

Cited by 15 publications

References 19 publications

Dynamic supplier selection approach for mining equipment company

Dynamic supplier selection approach for mining equipment company

Critical Success Factors for Supplier Development and Buyer Supplier Relationship

Three-dimensional QCD framework of supply chain

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About