2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10611-011-9321-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supply and demand: exposing the illicit trade in Cambodian antiquities through a study of Sotheby’s auction house

Abstract: Looters are reducing countless ancient sites to rubble in their search for buried treasures to sell on the international market.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(16 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Much of the literature in this area revolves around criminological and legal treatises that map contemporary black markets and illicit trade networks (Bowman, 2008; Campbell, 2013; Casey, 2015; Lane et al, 2008). Many of these works conceptualize war as a risk factor for the expansion and diversification of criminal networks and trafficking, and the resultant damage to heritage (Charney, 2016; Davis, 2011; Kersel, 2016; Mackenzie et al, 2020). Adjacent to this literature, a burgeoning school of thought also theorizes plunder and looting, often through the lens of conflict (Apaydin, 2020; Hicks, 2020; Tompkins, 2018).…”
Section: Resources and Conflict: Existing Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much of the literature in this area revolves around criminological and legal treatises that map contemporary black markets and illicit trade networks (Bowman, 2008; Campbell, 2013; Casey, 2015; Lane et al, 2008). Many of these works conceptualize war as a risk factor for the expansion and diversification of criminal networks and trafficking, and the resultant damage to heritage (Charney, 2016; Davis, 2011; Kersel, 2016; Mackenzie et al, 2020). Adjacent to this literature, a burgeoning school of thought also theorizes plunder and looting, often through the lens of conflict (Apaydin, 2020; Hicks, 2020; Tompkins, 2018).…”
Section: Resources and Conflict: Existing Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Archaeological site looting remains a particularly well-known and well documented form of heritage crime, sometimes obfuscating that other offences and actions also cause harm to cultural heritage. Decades' worth of scholars and journalists have noted both the archaeological impact of looting, and also its feed into international markets and organised crime networks (see, for example, Meyer, 1973;Davis, 2011): the problem seems to show no sign of abating.…”
Section: Heritage Crime Around the Worldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scholars of the international criminal market in cultural objects have access to a number of analyses of what we might characterize as the two ends of the global supply chain, in the form of studies of 'source' and 'market', but comparatively little about how looted cultural objects actually move from the ground to the international market buyer (see Brodie et al 2013 for a literature review of evidence-based studies in this field). With limited exceptions, the available data have clustered around looters who take objects from important archaeological sites (Staley 1993;Paredes Maury 1996;van Velzen 1996;Matsuda 1998;Farchakh Bajjaly 2008a;2008b) and dealers, museums and collectors around the world who provide the destinations for these stolen artefacts as part of their general acquisitive practices (Gill and Chippindale 1993;Chippindale and Gill 2000;Nørskov 2002;Mackenzie 2005;Davis 2011;Brodie and Bowman Proulx 2013).…”
Section: Introduction: From Source To Market But How?mentioning
confidence: 99%