2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.intman.2018.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supplier Strategies and Routines for Capability Development: Implications for Upgrading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
77
2
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
77
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Jensen and Petersen's (2013) framework also does not include the strategies and actions of sourcing partners, directed at effectuating change in the interfirm relationship (cf. Choksy et al 2017;Sinkovics et al 2018).…”
Section: Conceptual Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Jensen and Petersen's (2013) framework also does not include the strategies and actions of sourcing partners, directed at effectuating change in the interfirm relationship (cf. Choksy et al 2017;Sinkovics et al 2018).…”
Section: Conceptual Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The practice-based approach supplies these missing insights, along with a temporal dimension that allows the researcher to investigate the dynamics of inter-firm relationships over time (cf. Buckley et al 2018;Sinkovics and Sinkovics 2018).…”
Section: Conceptual Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Loss of this dynamic leads to a loss of the market leader position [38,39]. On the other hand, organisations that do not create the conditions for knowledge management and the knowledge strategy in development are lagging behind their competitors and, over time, the asymmetry between them increases [40,41]. Knowledge is becoming an important resource for coping with uncertainties and turbulence and the resulting influences and threats that may lead to crises in organisations or even to the termination of their business activities [35,36,42].…”
Section: Impact Of Age Management On Competitive Advantagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Choksy, Sinkovics and Sinkovics, 2017;Ponte et al, Chapter 6 this volume;Raj-Reichert, Chapter 22 this volume). A microfoundations approach is well suited to investigate how capabilities emerge from individual actions and interactions in both MNEs and suppliers and what managers can do to create or change capabilities (Felin and Foss, 2005;Foss, 2009;Hoque, Sinkovics, and Sinkovics, 2016;Sinkovics, Hoque and Sinkovics, 2018a). This is because it aims at achieving an understanding of how individual-level factors influence organizations, how the interactions of individuals contribute to organization level outcomes, and how macro-level variables are mediated by micro-level actions and interactions (Abell, Felin and Foss, 2008;Felin, Foss and Ployhart, 2015).…”
Section: The Knowing Mnementioning
confidence: 99%