Supplier relations and supply chain performance in financial services processes

Abstract

PurposeThis paper aims to empirically test the relationship between supplier relations and satisfaction with overall supplier performance in a services context at a process level of analysis.Design/methodology/approachTwo hypotheses are developed, one predicting a positive relationship between a multi‐dimensional construct of supplier relations and satisfaction with overall supplier performance, and one five‐part hypothesis predicting positive relationships between the underlying components of supplier relations and satisfaction with overall supplier performance. Using a sample of 108 financial services processes, the first hypothesis is tested using regression analysis, and the second hypothesis is tested using correlation analysis.FindingsAfter controlling for supplier efficiency and responsiveness, use of information technology, electronic information‐sharing, supplier type, and firm size, better supplier relations are associated with satisfaction with overall supplier performance. However, while the “partnering” components of the relationship (i.e. cooperation and long‐term commitment) are correlated with satisfaction with overall supplier performance, the “operational” components of the relationship (i.e. high degree of coordination, information‐sharing, and feedback) are not.Research limitations/implicationsLimited informant population, primarily single respondents, some single‐item variables.Practical implicationsThe research results suggest not only the importance of improving overall supplier relations, but also the particular benefits of building partnerships within the service supply chain through co‐operation and long‐term commitment in order to increase satisfaction with overall supplier performance.Originality/valueUnlike most empirical supply chain management studies, which use data from manufacturers at the strategic business unit or firm level, and recognizing that services and manufacturers differ in certain respects that are salient for supply chain management, this study uses data from a services industry (i.e. financial services) collected at the process level and provides unique insights into services and process level supply chain management.

Concentrated supply chain membership and financial performance: Chain‐ and firm‐level perspectives

“…The study's benchmarks reflect prior research suggesting controls for industry, size, and intertemporal effects (e.g., Field and Meile, 2008;Devaraj et al, 2007;Luo et al, 2007;Rosenzweig et al, 2003;Zhu and Kraemer, 2002;Frohlich and Westbrook, 2002). The design follows Dehning et al (2007) by controlling for industry at the 2-digit level (controlling at the 3-digit level changes no inferences).…”

Developing a resilient supply chain through supplier flexibility and reliability assessment

“…In today's global marketplace, firms are relying more on their supply chains to remain competitive (Whipple and Frankel 2000;Hult et al 2006;Field and Meile 2008;Manuj and Mentzer 2008). Intense competition has caused many firms to take advantage of new markets and lower production costs by expanding their supply chains, which has led to the development of more complex global supply chains (Tang, Gurnani, and Gupta 2014).…”

Supplier selection activities in the service sector: A case study in Nigeria

“…The study identifies numerous different categories of products and services and then evaluates the ability of numerous supplier organizations to fulfill the requirements of the case study company In today's global environment, the success of an organization often depends on their ability to build a network of reliable suppliers thereby indicating that supplier selection decisions are highly important [8]. The vast majority of research conducted on supplier selection activities is studied within the manufacturing industry [9,10] possibly due to the impact of the costs of raw materials on the final assembled product [11].…”