Supplier Involvement in New Product Development

Wang, Yuan; Modi, Sachin; Mishra, Saurabh

doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190066727.013.29

Cited by 3 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…, 2015; Silva et al. , 2019), which calls for further analysis of their boundary conditions in terms of product characteristics (Wang et al. , 2020).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…According to the contingencies of knowledge-based view, the knowing processes can be influenced by contingent factors (Kogut and Zander, 1992; Grant, 1996; Eisenhardt and Santos, 2006). In particular, Wang et al. (2020) argue that the performance impact of supplier involvement is contingent on product characteristics.…”

Section: Hypothesis Developmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…, 2019). By comparison, the contingent roles of product characteristics are less researched (Wang et al. , 2020).…”

Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…, 2007; Rijsdijk and Hultink, 2009). Product smartness can also act as a contingent factor in supplier involvement research, which has not been examined (Wang et al. , 2020).…”

Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…, 2018). Further based on the contingencies of knowledge-based view, we contend that product smartness can influence the amount and variety of knowledge acquired by supplier involvement, thus moderating its indirect impact on financial performance (Wang et al. , 2020).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Is supplier involvement always beneficial for financial performance? The roles of ambidextrous innovations and product smartness

Wang

Jia

Chen

2022

IJOPM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to investigate the performance impact of supplier involvement, based on the knowing processes and contingencies of knowledge-based view. Ambidextrous innovations (i.e. exploitative innovation and exploratory innovation) are taken as intermediary processes. Furthermore, product smartness is considered to clarify boundary conditions.Design/methodology/approachThe ordinary least squares regression was conducted, based on the two-source data collected from 125 high-tech firms in China.FindingsAmbidextrous innovations positively mediate the relationship between supplier involvement and financial performance. Product smartness weakens the indirect impact via exploratory innovation but not exploitative innovation.Originality/valueThis study reveals the knowledge application and recombination mechanisms of ambidextrous innovations to mediate between supplier involvement and financial performance. It also highlights digital encapsulation function of product smartness as a contingent factor.

show abstract

“…, 2015; Silva et al. , 2019), which calls for further analysis of their boundary conditions in terms of product characteristics (Wang et al. , 2020).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Hypothesis Developmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…, 2019). By comparison, the contingent roles of product characteristics are less researched (Wang et al. , 2020).…”

Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…, 2007; Rijsdijk and Hultink, 2009). Product smartness can also act as a contingent factor in supplier involvement research, which has not been examined (Wang et al. , 2020).…”

Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Is supplier involvement always beneficial for financial performance? The roles of ambidextrous innovations and product smartness

Wang

Jia

Chen

2022

IJOPM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Unveiling the link between operational interdependency and supply chain performance

Yang,

Xie,

Wang

2023

BIJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThis study investigates the possible curvilinear relationship between operational interdependency and supply chain performance as well as the contingency effect of supply chain disruptions, in terms of disruption orientation and disruption impact.Design/methodology/approachPath analysis was employed to test the hypotheses using the data collected from Chinese manufacturers.FindingsThe results confirm an inverted U-shape effect of operational interdependency. As level of buyer-supplier operational dependency increase, the supply chain performance is enhanced. However, the benefits of operational interdependency diminish beyond a certain point. Additionally, the findings of this study show the disruption orientations positively moderate the relationship between interdependency and performance, whereas the effect of disruption impact is not significant.Originality/valueThe findings of this study provide an explanation to the theoretical gap about the equivocal results of the effect of dependency, which provide new insights into the literature regarding buyer-supplier relationships. Furthermore, this paper identifies the moderating role of supply chain disruption in the relationship between operational interdependency and supply chain performance, which provide further explanation about the mixed results of the effect of dependency. The results confirmed that supply chain disruption orientation positively moderate the relationship between operational interdependency and supply chain performance.

show abstract

Justice in triad: Revisiting supplier involvement in new product development

Zhang

Zou

Wang

2022

Business Ethics Env & Resp

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Recognizing the importance of involving suppliers in the new product development (NPD) process, extensive studies have examined this issue at a buyer-supplier dyadic level. However, how supplier involvement leads to better NPD performance is not clearly explained. Additionally, extending the dyadic relationships to triadic relationships and addressing how to manage the two competing suppliers with fair conduct remains unexplored. To answer these questions, this study developed a conceptual model theorizing the role of supplier involvement, information sharing, and justice in the NPD process within a buyer-supplier-supplier triadic relationship. Based on survey data collected from 200 U.S. firms, Structural Equation Modeling is used to test the hypothesis. The results first confirmed the criticality of involving both primary and secondary suppliers during NPD. Second, the positive effect of triadic supplier involvement on innovation performance is fully mediated by information sharing.Finally, this study explored the different roles of procedural justice and distributive justice; the results confirmed that procedural justice acts as a moderator for the relationship between triadic supplier involvement and information sharing, whereas distributive justice moderates the effect between information sharing and innovation performance. Our findings contribute to the literature of triadic supplier involvementnew product development and relationship management. Accordingly, these findings highlight key implications for managers and policymakers.

show abstract

Supplier Involvement in New Product Development

Cited by 3 publications

References 0 publications

Is supplier involvement always beneficial for financial performance? The roles of ambidextrous innovations and product smartness

Is supplier involvement always beneficial for financial performance? The roles of ambidextrous innovations and product smartness

Unveiling the link between operational interdependency and supply chain performance

Justice in triad: Revisiting supplier involvement in new product development

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About