2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.pursup.2014.12.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supplier–customer relationships: A case study of power dynamics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
56
0
5

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 115 publications
1
56
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The analysis focuses on the three sets of dyadic relationships that can be formed between the three actors, the brand, the working consumers as individuals and the brand community that the working consumers participate in. It is not uncommon to examine small networks by examining the links between dyads (Lacoste & Johnsen, 2015) and this is the approach that this study adopts. Both members of the research team triangulated the analysis and ensured a clear chain of evidence to support interpretations (Belk, Fischer, & Kozinets, 2013).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis focuses on the three sets of dyadic relationships that can be formed between the three actors, the brand, the working consumers as individuals and the brand community that the working consumers participate in. It is not uncommon to examine small networks by examining the links between dyads (Lacoste & Johnsen, 2015) and this is the approach that this study adopts. Both members of the research team triangulated the analysis and ensured a clear chain of evidence to support interpretations (Belk, Fischer, & Kozinets, 2013).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the potential of collaborative strategic relationships for business is not being fully developed (Meehan & Wright, 2013), and hence it is observed a high failure rate (Schaltegger et al, 2011). In this sense, researchers recognise the need to consider a greater and dynamic interaction into the business ecosystem (Lacoste and Johnsen, 2015). In fact, the collaborative strategic relationships for service contracts are acknowledged to be rarely performed by a single actor at a single point-in-time (Chandler & Lusch, 2015;Pinnington et al, 2016).…”
Section: Business Scope For Sustainable Value Creationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Power can be viewed as the ability to affect another firm's behavior when asking something incompatible with a firm's desire, by getting a firm to do something they would not otherwise do, or to get a firm to act contrary to its interests (Cowan et al, 2015;Lacoste andJohnsen, 2015: Chicksand, 2015). Power asymmetries in a relationship allow the most powerful to dictate behavior and control interaction (Lacoste and Johnsen, 2015) and result from superior positions of capital, tangible and intangible assets, unique capabilities, information asymmetry, reputation, and intellectual property (Chicksand, 2015;Pazirandeh and Norman, 2014).…”
Section: Supplier Powermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Power asymmetries in a relationship allow the most powerful to dictate behavior and control interaction (Lacoste and Johnsen, 2015) and result from superior positions of capital, tangible and intangible assets, unique capabilities, information asymmetry, reputation, and intellectual property (Chicksand, 2015;Pazirandeh and Norman, 2014). Supplier power has been shown to negatively impact delivery, quality, innovation, and flexibility (Terpend and Ashenbaum, 2012).…”
Section: Supplier Powermentioning
confidence: 99%