2014
DOI: 10.1038/mt.2014.33
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supplementation of Influenza Split Vaccines with Conserved M2 Ectodomains Overcomes Strain Specificity and Provides Long-term Cross Protection

Abstract: Current influenza vaccines do not provide good protection against antigenically different influenza A viruses. As an approach to overcome strain specificity of protection, this study demonstrates significantly improved long-term cross protection by supplementing split vaccines with a conserved molecular target, a repeat of the influenza M2 ectodomain (M2e) expressed on virus-like particles (M2e5x VLPs) in a membrane-anchored form. Intramuscular immunization with H1N1 split vaccine (A/California/07/2009) supple… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
56
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
3
56
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A possible mechanism by which M2 antibodies provide protection is that influenza viruses bound to non-neutralizing antibodies are likely to be recognized and removed by opsonophagocytosis via Fc receptors [12, 2327]. In this study, M2e specific antibody after M2e5x VLP immunization was reactive to M2-expressing MDCK cell or MDCK cells infected with influenza viruses, which suggests that binding antibody to infected cell can mediate opsonophagocytosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A possible mechanism by which M2 antibodies provide protection is that influenza viruses bound to non-neutralizing antibodies are likely to be recognized and removed by opsonophagocytosis via Fc receptors [12, 2327]. In this study, M2e specific antibody after M2e5x VLP immunization was reactive to M2-expressing MDCK cell or MDCK cells infected with influenza viruses, which suggests that binding antibody to infected cell can mediate opsonophagocytosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…2). Also, in line with this result, co-immunization with mix of M2e5x VLP and split vaccines was shown to induce high levels of IgG2a antibody and improved cross protection [27]. Thus, shifting immunoglobulin isotypes to IgG2a antibodies as a result of M2e5x VLP immunization later might have contributed to improving cross protection in addition to the induction of M2e specific antibodies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Thus, as shown herein, it is highly significant that a universal vaccination strategy can provide superior cross protection to current vaccines in the scenario of when a first infecting virus is antigenically different from a vaccine strain. Protective mechanisms by M2e immunity include anti-M2e specific IgG antibodies, Fc γ receptors, natural killer cells, CD4 + and CD8 + T cells, alveolar macrophages, and dendritic cells (34, 37, 44-45). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is unclear what differences are in the protective mechanisms between NA protein and M2e5x VLP vaccines. T cells induced by M2e5x VLP vaccination were shown to play a role in conferring cross protection [17]. It is possible that in addition to M2e antibodies, T cells induced by M2e5x VLP vaccination contribute to more effective cross protection than NA protein immunization since we observed that N2 NA protein and M2e5x VLP immune sera conferred a similar level of protection against A/Phil H3N2 virus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Supplementation of inactivated influenza vaccines with M2e-based antigens resulted in inducing significantly improved cross protection in BALB/c mice [17]. It was reported that addition of NA and M2e vaccines to recombinant HA vaccines confers long-lasting cross protection against primary and secondary influenza virus infections in BALB/c mice [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%