1976
DOI: 10.1093/bja/48.9.907
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supplementation of General Anaesthesia With Narcotic Analgesics

Abstract: Four analgesic drugs--fentanyl, phenoperidine, morphine and pethidine--were compared in a double-blind trial involving 113 patients paralysed and ventilated with nitrous oxide and oxygen. The differences between the drugs were relatively small. There were only slight differences in "duration of action", a term which is questioned in this context. Pethidine appeared to have a slightly longer duration of action than the other drugs. The problems inherent in studying analgesics in this manner are discussed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fluctuations in blood pressure and pulse rate in response to developing awareness are the rule. Some workers' regard an increase in pulse rate as the most reliable sign of inadequate analgesia (Morgan et ah, 1974;Holmes, 1976), or an indication of decreasing analgesia (Florence, 1978).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fluctuations in blood pressure and pulse rate in response to developing awareness are the rule. Some workers' regard an increase in pulse rate as the most reliable sign of inadequate analgesia (Morgan et ah, 1974;Holmes, 1976), or an indication of decreasing analgesia (Florence, 1978).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Changes in heart rate, cardiac rhythm and arterial pressure, sweating and vasoconstriction have been reported during anaesthesia and surgery, particularly in patients who have received a myoneural blocking drug. These responses may be reduced or abolished by the use of narcotic supplements (Mushin and Rendell-Baker, 1949;Siker, 1956;Loder, 1957;Davies, 1957;Dundee et al, 1969;Holmes, 1976). However, it has always been difficult to define the clinical indications for giving increments of an analgesic (Siker, 1956;Holmes, 1976).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%