2014
DOI: 10.1080/00063657.2014.918577
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supplementary feeding of mealworms enhances reproductive success in garden nesting House SparrowsPasser domesticus

Abstract: Capsule Mealworm provisioning increased clutch size and chick survival in garden-nesting House Sparrows. Aim We tested experimentally whether invertebrate availability limits reproductive success in gardennesting House Sparrows Passer domesticus. Methods Mealworms were provided in feeders as supplementary food for House Sparrows nesting in suburban and rural domestic gardens. Surveys of provisioning adult sparrows were used to determine mealworm usage and nest outcomes were monitored. Results Provisioning pare… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…), providing invertebrates or other protein‐rich bird foods during the breeding season may enhance reproductive success (Peach et al. ). Nevertheless, from an ecosystem perspective, we believe that management activities that aim to increase the abundance of phytophagous insects in the birds’ environment, rather than providing supplementary food during the breeding season, will be more effective.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), providing invertebrates or other protein‐rich bird foods during the breeding season may enhance reproductive success (Peach et al. ). Nevertheless, from an ecosystem perspective, we believe that management activities that aim to increase the abundance of phytophagous insects in the birds’ environment, rather than providing supplementary food during the breeding season, will be more effective.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as increased levels of urbanization and the proportion of exotic vegetation are often positively correlated, disentangle the effect of vegetation from other effects of increased habitat urbanization is not easy. For example, even activities, such as bird-feeding in suburban gardens which seem to be quite harmless at first glance, could indirectly reduce local avian biodiversity, if overabundant, larger and aggressive species profit unequally more from feeders, excluding smaller, subordinant ones from the surroundings of feeding stations (Parsons et al 2006). Species-specific responses were also highlighted by a a correlative study in the UK (Fuller et al 2008), report-ing positive relationships between the densities of bird feeders and certain urban-dweller species (e.g.…”
Section: Effects Of Urbanization On Avian Biodiversity and Species Comentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We know of only two previous studies conducted in urban landscapes, both showing positive effects of feeding on reproduction (Dhindsa & Boag , Peach et al . ). Many studies have considered the effects of winter feeding on avian breeding densities (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, the same feeder counts (which over 1‐min periods averaged 82% of MCM c but only 24% of MCM cb ) and observations at identical feeders deployed in suburban Leicester (where 97% of mealworms were taken by Sparrows nesting within 26 m of feeders and the maximum distance at which provisioning adults collected mealworms for chicks was 165 m; Peach et al . ) suggest that the intensity of usage of mealworm feeders in London is likely to have declined strongly with distance of nests from feeders and therefore to have been much lower for pairs nesting in 200‐m surrounding buffers than for pairs nesting within core areas. Moreover, our mealworm provision was sufficient to cover most of the chick energy requirements of Sparrow pairs nesting within core areas and more than one‐third of the chick energy requirements of all pairs nesting within core‐plus‐200‐m buffers (Table ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation