2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10195-015-0357-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supplemental S1 fixation for type C pelvic ring injuries: biomechanical study of a long iliosacral versus a transsacral screw

Abstract: BackgroundA single iliosacral screw placed into the S1 vertebral body has been shown to be clinically unreliable for certain type C pelvic ring injuries. Insertion of a second supplemental iliosacral screw into the S1 or S2 vertebral body has been widely used. However, clinical fixation failures have been reported using this technique, and a supplemental long iliosacral or transsacral screw has been used. The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical effect of a supplemental S1 long iliosacral scr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
14
0
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(47 reference statements)
2
14
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…SD = standard deviation; HU = Hounsfield Units; y = years. www.nature.com/scientificreports www.nature.com/scientificreports/ biomechanical study seems to support our conclusion that there is a wide zone of sufficient bone quality in the vertebral bodies, which provides purchase similar to that of the cortex of the contralateral sacrum 27 . Some surgeons avoid fixation of the contralateral, uninjured sacroiliac joint in order to prevent pain, stiffness and delays in rehabilitation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…SD = standard deviation; HU = Hounsfield Units; y = years. www.nature.com/scientificreports www.nature.com/scientificreports/ biomechanical study seems to support our conclusion that there is a wide zone of sufficient bone quality in the vertebral bodies, which provides purchase similar to that of the cortex of the contralateral sacrum 27 . Some surgeons avoid fixation of the contralateral, uninjured sacroiliac joint in order to prevent pain, stiffness and delays in rehabilitation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…In a biomechanical cadaver study, the combination of a locked transsacral screw and one iliosacral screw showed better results than two "standard" iliosacral screws 26 , suggesting that the highest stability can be achieved when the thread passes through the contralateral sacroiliac joint and the os ilium cortex. However, in their biomechanical cadaver study, Salari et al 27 found no significant difference in stability between transsacral fixation and a long iliosacral screw, where this long screw did not perforate the contralateral sacroiliac joint. The latter Table 1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Currently, the conventional freehand fluoroscopy technique is very common for intraoperative visualization realized via image intensifier, which is possible in only one plane at a time, meanwhile requiring complex hand-eye coordination. [ 10 11 12 ] As such, it is a highly demanding and challenging operative technique. Recently, computer-assisted orthopedic surgery, which potentially increases the accuracy and efficiency of percutaneous targeting, has utilized image navigation systems and purpose-built robots.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sacroiliac screw (SIS) has become an effective internal xation method for sacral fracture and sacroiliac joint dislocation [1,2]. The classic SIS internal xation is placed percutaneously, which passes from the posterolateral side of the ilium through the sacroiliac joint into the vertebral body of the sacrum [3,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%