2013
DOI: 10.2172/1126363
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supplemental Immobilization of Hanford Low-Activity Waste: Cast Stone Screening Tests

Abstract: The work reported here was funded by Washington River Protection Solutions (WRPS). Dave Swanberg with WRPS led the effort and provided both programmatic guidance and technical input to the project team. These screening tests were very laboratory intensive. At Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Ben Williams was instrumental in preparing the Cast Stone specimens and conducting the leach tests. Don Rinehart prepared the simulants. Keith Geiszler, Steve Baum, Igor Kutnyakov, Christian Iovin, and Denness… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
127
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
127
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reductive capacity of LAW Cast Stone, both those prepared previously (see Westsik et al 2013) and newly prepared LAW NW-and SE-Cast Stones with high Tc concentration that had been leached using the EPA 1315 leach test of Cast Stone under air-equilibrated or O 2 -saturated leaching conditions decreased by ~30-70% after leaching compared to the same Cast Stones before leaching. The reductive capacity of both NW-and SE-Cast Stones decreased most significantly when they were fractured and leached under an O 2 -saturated condition because of the increased exposed surface areas from the fractures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reductive capacity of LAW Cast Stone, both those prepared previously (see Westsik et al 2013) and newly prepared LAW NW-and SE-Cast Stones with high Tc concentration that had been leached using the EPA 1315 leach test of Cast Stone under air-equilibrated or O 2 -saturated leaching conditions decreased by ~30-70% after leaching compared to the same Cast Stones before leaching. The reductive capacity of both NW-and SE-Cast Stones decreased most significantly when they were fractured and leached under an O 2 -saturated condition because of the increased exposed surface areas from the fractures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Measure the reductive capacity of different types of dry ingredients, the 8 LAW simulants used in Westsik et al (2013), and short-term cured Cast Stone before and after leaching with different leaching conditions. The reductive capacities of dry ingredients from NW and SE sources, various LAW simulants, and final Cast Stone before and after leaching tests were measured using two different methods, the Ce(IV) and Cr(VI) methods.…”
Section: Executive Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,4,5 • Determine the relationship between the Cast Stone reduction capacity measured by the Angus-Glasser Method 6 and leachability of Tc from depth discrete samples.…”
Section: Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note however that these limitations resulted in a targeted iodine concentration in the simulated salt solutions that was approximately two orders of magnitude higher than the expected concentration. 2 Future testing at more realistic iodine concentrations may be beneficial.…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 The current WRPS study is investigating simulated salt solutions at 5.0 M and 7.8 M sodium. 2,3 Increasing the sodium concentration in Cast Stone has the potential to significantly reduce the overall volume of the waste form, increase waste throughput rates, and reduce the time and expense needed to complete cleanup missions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%