2016
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2015.446
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supplemental folic acid in pregnancy and childhood cancer risk

Abstract: Background:We investigated the association between supplemental folic acid in pregnancy and childhood cancer in a nation-wide study of 687 406 live births in Norway, 1999–2010, and 799 children diagnosed later with cancer.Methods:Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) compared cancer risk in children by approximated periconceptional folic acid levels (folic acid tablets and multivitamins (0.6 mg), only folic acid (0.4 mg), only multivitamins (0.2 mg)) and cancer risk in unexposed.Results:Any folic acid levels were not a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(27 reference statements)
1
15
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence in some subgroup analyses, the numbers of included studies were too small and may influence the conclusions. Since the included studies in our meta-analysis were almost all casecontrol studies [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36]38] and only one a cohort study [37], recall bias and selection bias could have restricted the precision of our results. The preventive effect suggested by the case-control studies may be due to potential confounding factors and exposure misclassification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Hence in some subgroup analyses, the numbers of included studies were too small and may influence the conclusions. Since the included studies in our meta-analysis were almost all casecontrol studies [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36]38] and only one a cohort study [37], recall bias and selection bias could have restricted the precision of our results. The preventive effect suggested by the case-control studies may be due to potential confounding factors and exposure misclassification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, only 10 studies met the inclusion criteria: nine were case-control design studies [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36]38] and one was a cohort study [37] (Fig. 1).…”
Section: Literature Searchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations