1990
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4807307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supplemental and congenitally absent premolar teeth'

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 95 ] ST were also found to have a prevalence between 2.7% and 3.4% in Sub-Saharan and Asian populations. [ 37 96 ] These variations in global prevalence, especially for the Asian population, might stem from diversities in ethnicity, methodological differences, age groups examined and sample size. [ 37 63 97 ]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 95 ] ST were also found to have a prevalence between 2.7% and 3.4% in Sub-Saharan and Asian populations. [ 37 96 ] These variations in global prevalence, especially for the Asian population, might stem from diversities in ethnicity, methodological differences, age groups examined and sample size. [ 37 63 97 ]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is some variability reported regarding the overall frequency of supernumerary teeth among populations. Brown (1990) and Zhu et al (1996) report that Subsaharan African and Asian populations exhibit somewhat higher prevalence (between 2.7% and 3.4%) than that found in Brook (1974) and Luten (1967). That said, the relative population frequencies among the different categories and locations of supernumerary teeth are still unknown, so accurately characterizing interpopulation variability remains difficult.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%