Supervisor-subordinate relationships and employee performance appraisals: a multi-source investigation in Croatia

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to empirically examine supervisor-subordinate relationships and their impact on performance appraisal in Croatia. Specifically, we were interested in examining how supervisor-subordinate relationships impact subordinate perceptions of performance evaluation and the subordinate's reactions to the performance evaluation.Design/methodology/approachThis paper uses matched data from a sample of supervisors and subordinates (n = 53) in a leading organization in the hospitality industry in Croatia, as well as objective performance appraisal data to examine the impact of supervisor-subordinate relationships on subordinate reactions to performance appraisal.FindingsThe key findings of this study include (1) supervisor trustworthiness determines the quality of their relationship with subordinates and leads to interpersonal liking, and (2) supervisor-subordinate relationship quality has a significant impact on subordinate reactions to performance appraisal process and outcomes.Research limitations/implicationsThe overall sample size (n = 53) of this study is small, and limits our ability to make generalizations beyond a point. Also, since the sample included only Croatian individuals, the findings maybe an artifact of the fact that they all hold similar values. Future studies should examine these relationships in supervisor-subordinate dyads comprised of individuals of different cultural backgrounds.Practical implicationsSupervisors should attempt to have high quality relationships with most, if not all, subordinates, as this would lead to higher acceptance of the performance appraisal process, which can impact future performance. Also, trustworthiness is closely related to the subordinate's perception of the quality of relationship he/she shares with the supervisor.Originality/valueThis is the first known paper to empirically study performance appraisal processes and relationships in Croatia, which also included both supervisor and subordinate perspectives.

First, Be a Good Citizen: Organizational Citizenship Behaviors, Well-Being at Work and the Moderating Role of Leadership Styles

“…It was not possible to identify a relationship between leadership and well-being at work as the literature often suggests (e.g., [179][180][181]), which curbs the importance attributed to leaders as agents capable of decisively influencing the entire organizational reality. Relationships at work are also influenced by nonexclusively professional frameworks [182] and the cultural framework influences the style and importance of leadership for organizational results [183]. Our study was carried out in Portugal, whose culture is characterized by "high power-distance, mildly collectivist, feminine and strongly avoidant uncertainty" [184] (p. 185), at the antipodes of the American cultural model [185], in which leadership tends to acquire greater importance in organizational reality.…”

Evaluating the impact of performance appraisal on doctor’s task and contextual performance: A view of public sector hospitals in Karachi, Pakistan.

“…It shapes the individual behaviour either positively or negatively depending on how it is supposed by the key players such as employees. The supervisors and subordinates have been regarded as key players in accepting and believing that the appraisal system is fair, improving overall outcomes 30 . Henceforward, it is the hospital's responsibility to ensure the timely appraising of doctor's performance based on criteria.…”

The role of supervisor work-life support on the correlation between work autonomy, workload and performance: perspective from Tanzania banking employees

“…A supportive supervisor believes in the subordinate's talents and may convey this belief through vocal expressions of trust, appreciation, and faith. In this method, the supervisor can persuade the staff that they can achieve the set objectives by supporting work autonomy and thus, lead to improved performance [34,52]. A person's high level of autonomy as well as support will have the ability to make use of his psychological resources such as cognitive, which will, in turn, enable the person to generate ideas that are both original and beneficial to the individual as organization performance.…”