Supervisor role overload and frustration as antecedents of abusive supervision: The moderating role of supervisor personality

Abstract

Summary The current research explores supervisor‐level antecedents of abusive supervision in the workplace. Specifically, this study introduces affective events theory to the abusive supervision literature to suggest that supervisor role overload, a work‐related event, leads to supervisor frustration. As an intense negative emotional reaction, frustration, in turn, triggers supervisors to exhibit abusive behaviors in the workplace. Supervisor personality traits—namely, neuroticism, conscientiousness, and agreeableness—are also posited to moderate these hypothesized relationships. Specifically, neuroticism is expected to moderate the relationship between role overload and frustration while conscientiousness and agreeableness are expected to moderate the relationship between frustration and abusive supervision. Ultimately, we propose and examine a moderated‐mediation model. Multisource field data demonstrate general support for the hypothesized relationships. We conclude with theoretical and practical implications as well as future research avenues. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Winning at all costs: An exploration of bottom‐line mentality, Machiavellianism, and organisational citizenship behaviour

“…As we introduced the study, we emphasised the importance of integrity of the scientific process. The employment of this data collection is consistent with existing literature, which has successfully utilised this data collection approach to test theoretical models (e.g., Eissa & Lester, ; Greenbaum et al, ). The aforementioned procedures and steps were also designed following the suggestions of prior scholars (e.g., Judge, Scott, & Ilies, ; Wheeler, Shanine, Leon, & Whitman, ).…”

Demonstrating the Psychological Aspects of Stressors and Abusive Supervision Behavior: Attainment of Sustainability Under the Rubric of Resources Theory

“…Given the hindrance role of this behavior in the sustainable development of organizations, an increasing number of scholars have sought to probe its antecedents in order to lessen its deleterious effects. Prior empirical evidence has identified that some work stressors (e.g., exceedingly difficult job goals, task difficulty, role overload) are the antecedents of abusive supervision behavior (Burton et al, 2012;Mawritz et al, 2014;Eissa and Lester, 2017). These studies agree that work stressors often positively relate to negative behavior.…”

“…Therefore, COR provides the theoretical basis for understanding why and when challenge-hindrance stressors have a similar effect on abusive supervision behavior. The previous study has proposed that work stressors (i.e., role overload) are positively associated with abusive supervision through psychological resource depletion (Eissa and Lester, 2017). However, to date, there has been no empirical research on the mediating mechanism of specific resource depletion variables between work stressors and abusive supervision behavior.…”

“…However, one should not assume that all individuals respond to the same work stressors in the same way. Previous studies suggest that task valence (a perception of task value), exercise (a leisure activity) (Burton et al, 2012), and supervisor personality (Eissa and Lester, 2017) help explain why individuals' reactions to work stressors may vary. Such previous studies have neglected the possible moderating role of variables that reflect differences in self-regulatory resources.…”

Active and passive forms of destructive leadership in a military context: a systematic review and meta-analysis

“…Antecedents of destructive leadership initially received less attention than the potential outcomes, but this has changed dramatically over the past five years (Tepper et al, 2017;Zhang & Bednall, 2015). Possible antecedents range from micro-level to macro-level factors, such as supervisor personality traits (Eissa & Lester, 2017) and stress caused by climate conditions (Van de Vliert, Matthiesen, Gangsøy, Landro, & Einarsen, 2010) to antecedents in the military context like lack of sleep (Olsen, Pallesen, Torsheim, & Espevik, 2016). In a recent meta-analysis, Zhang and Bednall (2015) categorised antecedents into four main groups: supervisor-related, organization-related and subordinate-related antecedents, in addition to, demographic characteristics of supervisors and subordinates.…”