“…The number of studies in each category were as follows; five studies used at least one hop test [30,33,36,40,46], eight studies used an isokinetic dynamometry strength measure [30,31,34,37,38,40,42,45] and 18 different patient-reported OMs were utilised in 12 different studies [30, 32-39, 43, 44, 46]. Eighteen different clinical-based assessments (pain, range of motion, atrophy, effusion, laxity, Lysholm knee score, Tegner activity scale and international knee documentation committee knee evaluation) were used in 15 studies [31-38, 40, 43-48] and 14 other OMs (RTS status/activity level, re-rupture, gait analysis, functional movement screen, surgery satisfaction, imaging and demographics) were utilised in 10 studies [38,39,[41][42][43][44][46][47][48][49]. Methodological quality refers to the outcome of the quality appraisal undertaken by the review not the authors of this study.…”