2021
DOI: 10.1111/spc3.12579
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supervised machine learning methods in psychology: A practical introduction with annotated R code

Abstract: Machine learning methods for prediction and pattern detection are increasingly prevalent in psychological research. We provide an introductory overview of machine learning, its applications, and describe how to implement models for research. We review fundamental concepts of machine learning, such as prediction accuracy and out-ofsample evaluation, and summarize standard prediction algorithms including linear regressions, ridge regressions, decision trees, and random forests (plus additional algorithms in the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is because traditional regression analysis only inferences the result patterns from a given dataset while machine learning can not only extract the patterns from a given dataset but also predict the patterns in a new dataset. In other words, the traditional approach addresses the problem concerning whether the independent variables predict the dependent variables, while machine learning can address the question of how well the independent variables predict the dependent variables ( Rosenbusch et al, 2021 ). Therefore, this renders more reliability and generalizability of the results with machine learning analysis, making the results more replicable and generalizable ( Orrù et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is because traditional regression analysis only inferences the result patterns from a given dataset while machine learning can not only extract the patterns from a given dataset but also predict the patterns in a new dataset. In other words, the traditional approach addresses the problem concerning whether the independent variables predict the dependent variables, while machine learning can address the question of how well the independent variables predict the dependent variables ( Rosenbusch et al, 2021 ). Therefore, this renders more reliability and generalizability of the results with machine learning analysis, making the results more replicable and generalizable ( Orrù et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We first constructed the base models with the default hyperparameters of the algorithms, then we tuned the hyperparameters with the grid search method ( LaValle et al, 2004 ). We subsequently constructed the best models with the best parameters obtained via the grid search method and compared the r 2 values of these models to identify the best model ( Rosenbusch et al, 2021 ). However, owing to the small sample size of the study, even with the best models constructed, we still obtained a negative r 2 value for day 2 to day 4 analyses.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in contrast to predictive models, explanatory models typically include theoretically relevant confounding variables even when these variables turn out to be unrelated to the outcome (Shmueli, 2010). At the statistical level, explanatory models might be overinformed by idiosyncratic features of the dataset used to test them (i.e., overfitting), which could render them less well suited to predict outcomes in new data (Rosenbusch et al, 2020). Finally, explanatory models often prioritize elegance and simplicity, while human behavior is multidetermined and potentially idiosyncratic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For Compartmentalization these were organized, tidy, well-defined, and clear versus disorganized, untidy, and vague. 5 For those using R, see Rosenbusch et al (2021) for a detailed introduction to the use of random forests and related techniques.…”
Section: N O T E Smentioning
confidence: 99%