2005 International Conference on Neural Networks and Brain
DOI: 10.1109/icnnb.2005.1615010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supervised LLE in ICA Space for Facial Expression Recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unsupervised [22], [87], [110] or supervised [133], [187] non-linear feature selection techniques are less popular than linear techniques. Shan et al [134] showed that supervised techniques are usually more useful than unsupervised techniques.…”
Section: Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unsupervised [22], [87], [110] or supervised [133], [187] non-linear feature selection techniques are less popular than linear techniques. Shan et al [134] showed that supervised techniques are usually more useful than unsupervised techniques.…”
Section: Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both methods are closely related to previous supervised manifold learning techniques developed for the classification scenario. Specifically, Option 1.1 is akin to techniques that limit the neighborhood to points of the same class [19,11,30,20]. Interestingly, Teoh et al call this approach "neighborhood discriminant criterion" and argue that it is equivalent to the Fisher discriminant criterion [20].…”
Section: Supervised Stagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research in this area has, for the most part, viewed the problem as a classification problem wherein the viewing sphere is (artificially) quantized into non-overlapping subintervals, and head pose is represented by a set of discrete pose labels-rather than a continuum of pose angles. This approach appears to be adequate for coarse pose estimation (with some reservations) [9,10,11,12,13,14,15], and other classification problems such as facial expression and face recognition [16,17,18,19,20]. It is, however, fundamentally flawed when used for fine-grain pose estimation for two main reasons: (i) pose estimation discontinuities occur at class boundaries due to the arbitrary nature of the pose classes, (ii) the numerical properties (scale, well-ordering) of the underlying pose angles are lost; for example, the difference between pose label 1 and pose label 2 is viewed no differently than between pose labels 1 and 5.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing molecular docking schemes, such as AutoDock Vina [3], Uni-Dock [4], and LeDock [5], typically rely on conformational sampling algorithms and empirical scoring functions to search for protein and ligand binding poses and predict ligand conformations at the target protein binding site based on factors such as ligand internal energy and protein-ligand interaction energy [6]. However, these methods struggle to accurately describe various interaction forms between proteins and ligands, mainly due to simplified scoring functions for ensuring computational speed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%