2007
DOI: 10.1192/pb.bp.106.012252
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supervised community treatment and section 17 of the Mental Health Act 1983

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…32 With this statement emanating from a national body and the lack of robust evidence, it is difficult to find academic papers supporting their use. [33][34][35] A debate in the British Journal of Psychiatry presented arguments for and against the use of CTOs. 32 Those opposing CTOs cited lack of evidence, the danger of increasing compulsion and prolonged medical supervision, unresolved ethical concerns (autonomy v. medical paternalism) and a distraction from finding voluntary solutions in the community.…”
Section: Arguments For Ctosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32 With this statement emanating from a national body and the lack of robust evidence, it is difficult to find academic papers supporting their use. [33][34][35] A debate in the British Journal of Psychiatry presented arguments for and against the use of CTOs. 32 Those opposing CTOs cited lack of evidence, the danger of increasing compulsion and prolonged medical supervision, unresolved ethical concerns (autonomy v. medical paternalism) and a distraction from finding voluntary solutions in the community.…”
Section: Arguments For Ctosmentioning
confidence: 99%