2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.03.24.005553
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supertertiary protein structure affects an allosteric network

Abstract: Corresponding authors: Stefano.Gianni@uniroma1.it; Per.Jemth@imbim.uu.seThe notion that protein function is allosterically regulated by structural or dynamic changes in proteins has been extensively investigated in several protein domains in isolation. In particular, PDZ domains have represented a paradigm for these studies, despite providing conflicting results. Furthermore, it is still unknown how the association between protein domains in supramodules, consitituting so-called supertertiary structure, affect… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We find excellent agreement between inferred free energies of folding relative to the wild-type (ΔΔG f ) and those corresponding to single AA substitutions determined in vitro for PSD95-PDZ3 (F337W background) 42 (Figure 2e, Pearson’s R = 0.79, n = 30, p-value = 2e-7). Binding free energy changes similarly agree with those measured by stopped-flow experiments for the PSD95-PDZ3:CRIPT interaction 43 (Figure 2e, Pearson’s R = 0.91, n = 26, p-value = 8e-11; see Figure S6 for additional comparisons to smaller-scale in vitro validation datasets). Using only the binding or only single AA substitutions data results in worse agreement with the in vitro binding and folding free energy changes (Figure S4), as does reducing the number of double mutants used to fit the model (Figure S5).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…We find excellent agreement between inferred free energies of folding relative to the wild-type (ΔΔG f ) and those corresponding to single AA substitutions determined in vitro for PSD95-PDZ3 (F337W background) 42 (Figure 2e, Pearson’s R = 0.79, n = 30, p-value = 2e-7). Binding free energy changes similarly agree with those measured by stopped-flow experiments for the PSD95-PDZ3:CRIPT interaction 43 (Figure 2e, Pearson’s R = 0.91, n = 26, p-value = 8e-11; see Figure S6 for additional comparisons to smaller-scale in vitro validation datasets). Using only the binding or only single AA substitutions data results in worse agreement with the in vitro binding and folding free energy changes (Figure S4), as does reducing the number of double mutants used to fit the model (Figure S5).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…7), which is required for inhibition of phosphate transport (16). Allosteric networks and allosteric communication are essential regulators of PDZ-containing multidomain protein conformational changes and function (44,45).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, for the category C proteins with cooperative domains, the protocol aiming to gather evolutionary information from sequences covering inter-domain interactions (i.e., protocol C) realized the best results. In a rare case (PSD95 with training size 0.8), the performance of the protocol B was comparable to the protocol C. A possible reason is that the mutagenesis assay was conducted for the isolated PDZ domain, not for the full length [40]. Nonetheless, in the remaining cases, the protocol C was better than the protocol B.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we classified the proteins into four categories considering their domain architecture and (non-)existence of intramolecular domain interactions. The single-domain proteins (TEM-1 [11] and APH(3’)-II [12]) were classified into the category A; in the category B, the multi-domain proteins without intramolecular domain interactions were collected (ubiquitin [13], YAP65 [14], and E3 ligase [15]); the proteins known to have interacting domains fell into the category C (PSD95 [16, 40] and Pab1 [17,41,42]). Each of these protein categories corresponded to the respective protein engineering scenarios described above.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%